Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32239295›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2020

Percutaneous US-guided MWA of small liver HCC: predictors of outcome and risk factors for complications from a single center experience.

Pierpaolo Biondetti, Enrico Maria Fumarola, Anna Maria Ierardi, Andrea Coppola, Giovanna Gorga, Luca Maggi, Elena Valconi, Salvatore Alessio Angileri, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierpaolo BiondettiPostgraduate School in Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Pierpaolo.biondetti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-2053
Enrico Maria FumarolaPostgraduate School in Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-6277
Anna Maria IerardiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-8018
Andrea CoppolaRadiology Department, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Giovanna GorgaPostgraduate School in Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca MaggiPostgraduate School in Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elena ValconiPostgraduate School in Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore Alessio AngileriDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-4277
University of Milan · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e CarloAziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale dei Sette Laghi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of outcome and complications in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA). Patients with non-previously treated small (≤ 3 cm) HCCs who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between July 2016 and January 2019 were included. For each patient, the following variables were registered: age, sex, albumin, platelet count, INR/PT, PTT ratio, total bilirubin, liver status, etiology of liver disease, Child-Pugh classification, tumor dimension, margin, and hepatic segment, tumor subcapsular, perihilar or perivascular location, HCC focality, ascites. During follow-up, complications and outcomes were registered. Variables were then analyzed in relation to both outcomes and complications. 74 patients were included. Mean CT follow-up was 6.2 months (range 1-24 months). At least one complication occurred in 48% of patients, the majority being asymptomatic imaging findings not requiring intervention. One major complication was registered (duodenal perforation: 1.3%). The occurrence of complications was associated with HCC multifocality and abnormal INR/PT, duodenal wall edema with tumor dimension, portal vein thrombosis with Child Pugh score, perihepatic free fluid with abnormal platelet count and comorbidities. Incomplete response rate at 1 month was 18.9%. Local tumor progression and new HCC nodules rates were 13.5% and 27%, respectively. Incomplete response at 1 month was associated with both alcoholic etiology of liver disease and II segment tumor location, new HCC nodules with PBC. Despite the small series analyzed, significant factors related with complications and outcomes may be kept in mind when planning the best treatment for each patient.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularCatheter AblationFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMicrowavesMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyComplicationsHepatocellular carcinomaMicrowave ablationOutcomeThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID32239295
OpenAlexW3014966514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.