Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32239245›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Inter-trial phase coherence of visually evoked postural responses in virtual reality.

David Engel, Adrian Schütz, Milosz Krala, Jakob C B Schwenk, Adam P Morris, Frank Bremmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Coupled Dynamics of Stimulus-Evoked Gustatory Cortical and Basolateral Amygdalar Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David EngelDepartment of Neurophysics, University of Marburg, Karl-v.-Frisch-Str. 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany. david.engel@physik.uni-marburg.de.
Adrian SchützDepartment of Neurophysics, University of Marburg, Karl-v.-Frisch-Str. 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Milosz KralaDepartment of Neurophysics, University of Marburg, Karl-v.-Frisch-Str. 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Jakob C B SchwenkDepartment of Neurophysics, University of Marburg, Karl-v.-Frisch-Str. 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Adam P MorrisDepartment of Physiology, Neuroscience Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Frank BremmerDepartment of Neurophysics, University of Marburg, Karl-v.-Frisch-Str. 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Giessen · DEMonash University · AU

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC/TRR-135Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft IRTG-1901Horizon 2020 734227 - PLATYPUS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision plays a central role in maintaining balance. When humans perceive their body as moving, they trigger counter movements. This results in body sway, which has typically been investigated by measuring the body's center of pressure (COP). Here, we aimed to induce visually evoked postural responses (VEPR) by simulating self-motion in virtual reality (VR) using a sinusoidally oscillating "moving room" paradigm. Ten healthy subjects participated in the experiment. Stimulation consisted of a 3D-cloud of random dots, presented through a VR headset, which oscillated sinusoidally in the anterior-posterior direction at different frequencies. We used a force platform to measure subjects' COP over time and quantified the resulting trajectory by wavelet analyses including inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC). Subjects exhibited significant coupling of their COP to the respective stimulus. Even when spectral analysis of postural sway showed only small responses in the expected frequency bands (power), ITPC revealed an almost constant strength of coupling to the stimulus within but also across subjects and presented frequencies. Remarkably, ITPC even revealed a strong phase coupling to stimulation at 1.5 Hz, which exceeds the frequency range that has generally been attributed to the coupling of human postural sway to an oscillatory visual scenery. These findings suggest phase-locking to be an essential feature of visuomotor control.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAdultHumansMotion PerceptionPostural BalancePsychomotor PerformanceBody swayCOPFrequencyPhase coherencePostural responseVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32239245
PMCPMC7237531
OpenAlexW3015022625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.