ArticleNucleic acids research2020
Isolation and analysis of rereplicated DNA by Rerep-Seq.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological re-replication during human stem cell differentiation.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- The relationship between DNA damage and repair and the occurrence and development of disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- RAD51 restricts DNA over-replication from re-activated origins.The EMBO journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Unscheduled DNA replication in G1 causes genome instability and damage signatures indicative of replication collisions.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Preventing excess replication origin activation to ensure genome stability.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- Anatomy and evolution of a DNA replication origin.Chromosoma · 2021Article
- Dynamics of replication origin over-activation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in gene copy number contribute to genomic instability, the onset and progression of cancer, developmental abnormalities and adaptive potential. The origins of gene amplifications have remained elusive; however, DNA rereplication has been implicated as a source of gene amplifications. The inability to determine which sequences are rereplicated and under what conditions have made it difficult to determine the validity of the proposed models. Here we present Rerep-Seq, a technique that selectively enriches for rereplicated DNA in preparation for analysis by DNA sequencing that can be applied to any species. We validated Rerep-Seq by simulating DNA rereplication in yeast and human cells. Using Rerep-Seq, we demonstrate that rereplication induced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deregulated origin licensing is non-random and defined by broad domains that span multiple replication origins and topological boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.