Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32239210›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Effect of Delayed Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy vs Whole-Breast Radiotherapy on Local Recurrence and Survival: Long-term Results From the TARGIT-A Randomized Clinical Trial in Early Breast Cancer.

Jayant S Vaidya, Max Bulsara, Christobel Saunders, Henrik Flyger, Jeffrey S Tobias, Tammy Corica, Samuele Massarut, Frederik Wenz, Steffi Pigorsch, Michael Alvarado and 29 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00983684 phase3completednot on this map

TARGIT: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Targeted Intra-operative Radiotherapy With Conventional Post-operative Radiotherapy After Conservative Breast Surgery for Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2000 to 2012Enrolled3,451ConditionsInvasive Breast Cancer, Breast CancerArmsIntrabeam, Post-operative radiotherapy
NCT06093854 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy Vesus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Managing Spinal Metastases: A Prospective, Single-center, Open-label, Non-inferior, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Changzheng HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled132ConditionsSpinal MetastasesArmsIntraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Long-term results of a randomized partial irradiation trial compared to whole breast irradiation in the early stage and low-risk breast cancer patients after conservative surgery.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Intraoperative radiotherapy vs. multicatheter brachytherapy as accelerated partial-breast irradiation: a secondary analysis of two multicenter prospective cohorts.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The evolution of targeted intra operative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Jayant S VaidyaDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Max BulsaraDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christobel SaundersUniversity of Western Australia School of Surgery, West Australia, Australia.
Henrik FlygerDepartment of Breast Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeffrey S TobiasDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Tammy CoricaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, West Australia, Australia.
Samuele MassarutDepartment of Surgery, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Frederik WenzUniversity Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.
Steffi PigorschRed Cross Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael AlvaradoDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Michael DouekNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wolfgang EiermannRed Cross Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chris Brew-GravesDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Norman WilliamsDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ingrid PotykaDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas RobertsDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marcelle BernsteinPatient Advocate and Writer, London, United Kingdom.
Douglas BrownDepartment of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Elena SperkUniversity Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.
Siobhan LawsDepartment of Surgery, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Marc SütterlinUniversity Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.
Steinar LundgrenDepartment of Oncology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Dennis HolmesHelen Rey Breast Cancer Foundation, John Wayne Cancer Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Lorenzo VinanteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Fernando BozzaInstituto Oncologico Veneto, Padoa, Italy.
Montserrat PazosUniversity Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilians Universitat, Munich, Germany.
Magali Le Blanc-OnfroyOncologue radiothérapeute, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.
Günther GruberBrust Zentrum Seefeld, Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wojciech PolkowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Konstantin J DedesBreast Center, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marcus NiewaldSaarland University Medical Center, Homberg, Germany.
Jens BlohmerSankt Gertrauden-Krankenhaus, and The Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David McCreadyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard HoeferSentara Surgery Specialists, Hampton, Virginia.
Pond KelemenAshikari Breast Center, New York Medical College, New York, New York.
Gloria PetraliaDepartment of Surgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Mary FalzonDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Michael BaumDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David JosephDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, West Australia, Australia.
University College London · GBSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DECentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEImmunologie-Zentrum Zürich · CHInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITKrankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Lublin · PLNew York Medical College · USNinewells Hospital · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoyal Hampshire County Hospital · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBSaarland University · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Department of Health 07/60/49Department of Health 10/104/07Department of Health 14/49/13Department of Health HTA/14/49/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Conventional adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer given daily for several weeks is onerous and expensive. Some patients may be obliged to choose a mastectomy instead, and some may forgo radiotherapy altogether. We proposed a clinical trial to test whether radiotherapy could be safely limited to the tumor bed. Objective: To determine whether delayed second-procedure targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) is noninferior to whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in terms of local control. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio) noninferiority trial, 1153 patients aged 45 years or older with invasive ductal breast carcinoma smaller than 3.5 cm treated with breast conservation were enrolled from 28 centers in 9 countries. Data were locked in on July 3, 2019. Interventions: The TARGIT-A trial was started in March 2000; patients were randomized after needle biopsy to receive TARGIT-IORT immediately after lumpectomy under the same anesthetic vs EBRT and results have been shown to be noninferior. A parallel study, described in this article, was initiated in 2004; patients who had their cancer excised were randomly allocated using separate randomization tables to receive EBRT or delayed TARGIT-IORT given as a second procedure by reopening the lumpectomy wound. Main Outcomes and Measures: A noninferiority margin for local recurrence rate of 2.5% at 5 years, and long-term survival outcomes. Results: Overall, 581 women (mean [SD] age, 63 [7] years) were randomized to delayed TARGIT-IORT and 572 patients (mean [SD] age, 63 [8] years) were randomized to EBRT. Sixty patients (5%) had tumors larger than 2 cm, or had positive nodes and only 32 (2.7%) were younger than 50 years. Delayed TARGIT-IORT was not noninferior to EBRT. The local recurrence rates at 5-year complete follow-up were: delayed TARGIT-IORT vs EBRT (23/581 [3.96%] vs 6/572 [1.05%], respectively; difference, 2.91%; upper 90% CI, 4.4%). With long-term follow-up (median [IQR], 9.0 [7.5-10.5] years), there was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.003; P = .052), mastectomy-free survival (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; P = .38), distant disease-free survival (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.39; P = .98), or overall survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = .80). Conclusions and Relevance: These long-term data show that despite an increase in the number of local recurrences with delayed TARGIT-IORT, there was no statistically significant decrease in mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival. Trial Registration: ISRCTN34086741, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00983684.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32239210
PMCPMC7348682
OpenAlexW3014602666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.