Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238516›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of rheumatology2020

Utility of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire to Monitor Patient Beliefs in Systemic Vasculitis.

Mollie N Schwartz, Casey A Rimland, Kaitlin A Quinn, Marcela A Ferrada, K Bates Gribbons, Joel S Rosenblum, Wendy Goodspeed, Elaine Novakovich, Peter C Grayson

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mollie N SchwartzM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Casey A RimlandC.A. Rimland, PhD, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, NIH, NIAMS, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Medical Scientist Training Program, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-6921
Kaitlin A QuinnK.A. Quinn, MD, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, NIH, NIAMS, Bethesda, Maryland, and Division of Rheumatology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Marcela A FerradaM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
K Bates GribbonsM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Joel S RosenblumM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Wendy GoodspeedM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Elaine NovakovichM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter C GraysonM.N. Schwartz, BS, M.A. Ferrada, MD, K.B. Gribbons, BS, J.S. Rosenblum, BS, W. Goodspeed, RN, E. Novakovich, RN, P.C. Grayson, MD, MSc, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland; peter.grayson@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Vasculitis and Translational MedicineZIAAR041204 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI GRAYSON, PETER · 2015 to 2025
$15.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the validity and clinical utility of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) to measure illness perceptions in multiple forms of vasculitis.

methodsPatients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TA), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), and relapsing polychondritis (RP) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort. Patients independently completed the BIPQ, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36), and a patient global assessment (PtGA) at successive study visits. Physicians concurrently completed a physician global assessment (PGA) form. Illness perceptions, as assessed by the BIPQ, were compared to responses from the full-length Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) and to other clinical outcome measures.

resultsThere were 196 patients (GCA = 47, TA = 47, RP = 56, AAV = 46) evaluated over 454 visits. Illness perception scores in each domain were comparable between the BIPQ and IPQ-R (3.28 vs 3.47,

conclusionThe BIPQ is an accurate and valid assessment tool to measure and monitor illness perceptions in patients with vasculitis. Use of the BIPQ as an outcome measure in clinical trials may provide complementary information to physician-based assessments.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisTakayasu ArteritisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairescohort studiesgiant cell arteritisTakayasu arteritisvasculitis

Identifiers

PMID32238516
PMCPMC7529645
OpenAlexW3014957705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.