ReviewNeoReviews2020
Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.
Review in NeoReviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Swiss Recommendations for the Perinatal Care of Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Guideline
- Association of Fortification with Human Milk versus Bovine Milk-Based Fortifiers on Short-Term Outcomes in Preterm Infants-A Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- How parents derive their informed role preferences for end-of-life medical decision-making for (unborn) children in perinatology: a meta-ethnography of qualitative interview studies.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Informed nondissent: an underutilized tool for the NICU context.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Integrating family values into antenatal consultations: An observational study on structured communication training curriculum for neonatal care providers.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Parents' perspectives on the use of statistics to convey uncertainty in the NICU: a qualitative analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Moving toward meaningful shared decision-making in neonatal care: clinical practice and policy implications in Korea.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Experiences and challenges in perinatal palliative care: a qualitative study among parents and healthcare providers in regional and tertiary hospitals.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Infants Born at 21 Weeks' Gestational Age.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- The impact of shared decision making on transitional preparation in children with recurrent pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Extending the concept of moral distress to parents of infants hospitalized in the NICU: a qualitative study in Greece.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- The Ethics and Practice of Periviability Care.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- The use of projected autonomy in antenatal shared decision-making for periviable neonates: a qualitative study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2023Article
- Understanding the Family Context: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Parent and NICU Clinician Experiences and Perspectives.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: analysing real-time conversations between healthcare professionals and families of critically ill newborns.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Shared responsibility for decision-making in NICU: A scoping review.Nursing ethics · 2023Article
- Influence of E-consultation on the Intention of First-Visit Patients to Select Medical Services: Results of a Scenario Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Non-mosaic trisomy 22 and congenital heart surgery using the shared decision making model: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ethical dilemmas and predominant frameworks surrounding decision making for critically ill newborns have evolved substantially over the last 40 years. A shared decision-making approach is now favored, involving an exchange of information between parents and clinicians that emphasizes parental values and preferences, resulting in a personalized approach to decision making. In this review, we summarize the history of clinical decision making with a focus on the NICU, highlight different models of decision making, describe the advantages and current limitations of shared decision making, and discuss the ongoing and future challenges of decision making in the NICU amidst medical innovations and emerging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.