Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238480›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies.

Jie Liu, Ruolei Gu, Chong Liao, Juanzhi Lu, Yuxing Fang, Pengfei Xu, Yue-Jia Luo, Fang Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional magnetic resonance imaging research in China.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie LiuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060.
Ruolei GuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China, 100101.
Chong LiaoSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060.
Juanzhi LuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060.
Yuxing FangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875.
Pengfei XuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060.
Yue-Jia LuoSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060.
Fang CuiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China, 518060 cuifang0826@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an important cognitive bias, the framing effect shows that our decision preferences are sensitive to the verbal description (i.e., frame) of options. This study focuses on the neural underpinnings of the social framing effect, which is based on decision-making regarding other people. A novel paradigm was used in which participants made a trade-off between economic benefits and the feelings of others. This decision was described as either a "harm" to, or "not helping," other persons in two conditions (Harm frame vs Help frame). Both human males and females were recruited. Participants behaved more prosocially for Harm frame compared with Help frame, resulting in a significant social framing effect. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, Experiment 1 showed that the social framing effect was associated with stronger activation in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), especially its right part. The functional connectivity between the right TPJ (rTPJ) and medial prefrontal cortex predicted the social framing effect on the group level. In Experiment 2, we used transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate the activity of the rTPJ and found that the social framing effect became more prominent under anodal (excitatory) stimulation, while the nonsocial framing effect elicited by the economic gain/loss gambling frame remained unaffected. The rTPJ results might be associated with moral conflicts modulated by the social consequences of an action or different levels of mentalizing with others under different frame conditions, but alternative interpretations are also worth noting. These findings could help elucidate the psychological mechanisms of the social framing effect.

Indexed as

AmygdalaDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultdecision-makingfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmultivoxel pattern analysisright temporoparietal junctionsocial framing effect; transcranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32238480
PMCPMC7189763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.