ArticleJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2020
A Simple Clinical Tool for Stratifying Risk of Clinically Significant CKD after Nephrectomy: Development and Multinational Validation.
Article in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal deep learning model for AI-based functional prognostic risk stratification in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Renal Function Deterioration and Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy for Renal Masses: A Pilot Study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Perioperative systemic treatments in renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Risk factors and predictive model for acute kidney Injury Transition to acute kidney disease in patients following partial nephrectomy.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Kidney failure, CKD progression and mortality after nephrectomy.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in 2021: Obsolete.European urology open science · 2022Article
- More than ancillary records: clinical implications of renal pathology examination in tumor nephrectomy specimens.Journal of nephrology · 2021Article
- Effects of metabolic syndrome on renal function after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinically significant CKD following surgery for kidney cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but identifying patients at increased CKD risk remains difficult. Simple methods to stratify risk of clinically significant CKD after nephrectomy are needed.
methodsTo develop a tool for stratifying patients' risk of CKD arising after surgery for kidney cancer, we tested models in a population-based cohort of 699 patients with kidney cancer in Queensland, Australia (2012-2013). We validated these models in a population-based cohort of 423 patients from Victoria, Australia, and in patient cohorts from single centers in Queensland, Scotland, and England. Eligible patients had two functioning kidneys and a preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m
resultsAbsolute risks of stage 3b or higher CKD were <2%, 3% to 14%, 21% to 26%, and 46% to 69% across the four strata of negligible, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively. The negative predictive value of the negligible risk category was 98.9% for clinically significant CKD. The
conclusionsOur simple scoring system can reproducibly stratify postnephrectomy CKD risk on the basis of readily available parameters. This clinical tool's quantitative assessment of CKD risk may be weighed against other considerations when planning management of kidney tumors and help inform shared decision making between clinicians and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.