Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238405›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Neehar D Parikh, Anand S Mehta, Amit G Singal, Timothy Block, Jorge A Marrero, Anna S Lok

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Neehar D ParikhDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. ndparikh@med.umich.edu.
Anand S MehtaDepartment of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Amit G SingalDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Timothy BlockBaruch S. Blumberg Institute of The Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, Pennsylvania.
Jorge A MarreroDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Anna S LokDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USHepatitis B Foundation · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

University of Michigan Center for Gastrointestinal ResearchP30DK034933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI OMARY, BISHR · 1986 to 2021
$22.5M
Precision Risk Stratification and Screening for HCC among Patients with Cirrhosis in the United StatesU01CA230694 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NOVEL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE LIVER CANCER SURVEILLANCE UPTAKE AND EARLY DETECTIONU01CA230669 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOK, ANNA S.F., SU, GRACE L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Precision Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with CirrhosisR01CA222900 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222900NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230669NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230694NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the cancer with the fastest increase in mortality in the United States, with more than 39,000 cases and 29,000 deaths in 2018. As with many cancers, survival is significantly improved by early detection. The median survival of patients with early HCC is >60 months but <15 months when detected at an advanced stage. Surveillance of at-risk patients improves outcome, but fewer than 20% of those at risk for HCC receive surveillance, and current surveillance strategies have limited sensitivity and specificity. Ideally, blood-based biomarkers with adequate sensitivity or specificity would be available for early detection of HCC; however, the most commonly used biomarker for HCC, alpha-fetoprotein, has inadequate performance characteristics. There are several candidate serum proteomic, glycomic, and genetic markers that have gone through early stages of biomarker validation and have shown promise for the early detection of HCC, but these markers require validation in well-curated cohorts. Ongoing prospective cohort studies will permit retrospective longitudinal (phase III biomarker study) validation of biomarkers. In this review, we highlight promising candidate biomarkers and biomarker panels that have completed phase II evaluation but require further validation prior to clinical use.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularEarly Detection of CancerHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32238405
PMCPMC7529652
OpenAlexW3014665169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.