Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238339›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Evaluating the Feasibility of Frequent Cognitive Assessment Using the Mezurio Smartphone App: Observational and Interview Study in Adults With Elevated Dementia Risk.

Claire Lancaster, Ivan Koychev, Jasmine Blane, Amy Chinner, Leona Wolters, Chris Hinds

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Examination of the reliability and feasibility of two smartphone applications to assess executive functioning in racially diverse older adults.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire LancasterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5169-1575
Ivan KoychevDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-8493
Jasmine BlaneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-462X
Amy ChinnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-7780
Leona WoltersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3151-953X
Chris HindsNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8830-2086
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N029941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy enabling frequent, sensitive, and economic remote assessment, smartphones will facilitate the detection of early cognitive decline at scale. Previous studies have sustained participant engagement with remote cognitive assessment over a week; extending this to a period of 1 month clearly provides a greater opportunity for measurement. However, as study durations are increased, the need to understand how participant burden and scientific value might be optimally balanced also increases.

objectiveThis study explored the little but often approach to assessment employed by the Mezurio app when prompting participants to interact every day for over a month. Specifically, this study aimed to understand whether this extended duration of remote study is feasible, and which factors promote sustained participant engagement over such periods.

methodsA total of 35 adults (aged 40-59 years) with no diagnosis of cognitive impairment were prompted to interact with the Mezurio smartphone app platform for up to 36 days, completing short, daily episodic memory tasks in addition to optional executive function and language tests. A subset (n=20) of participants completed semistructured interviews focused on their experience of using the app.

resultsParticipants complied with 80% of the daily learning tasks scheduled for subsequent tests of episodic memory, with 88% of participants still actively engaged by the final task. A thematic analysis of the participants' experiences highlighted schedule flexibility, a clear user interface, and performance feedback as important considerations for engagement with remote digital assessment.

conclusionsDespite the extended study duration, participants demonstrated high compliance with the schedule of daily learning tasks and were extremely positive about their experiences. Long durations of remote digital interaction are therefore definitely feasible but only when careful attention is paid to the design of the users' experience.

Indexed as

DementiaMobile ApplicationsAdultCognitionFeasibility StudiesHumansMiddle AgedSmartphoneAlzheimer diseasecognitionearly diagnosisecological momentary assessmentfeasibility studymhealthmobile phonesmartphonetechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID32238339
PMCPMC7163418
OpenAlexW2978367895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.