Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238165›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Co-production of "nature walks for wellbeing" public health intervention for people with severe mental illness: use of theory and practical know-how.

Gill Hubbard, Catharine Ward Thompson, Robert Locke, Dan Jenkins, Sarah-Anne Munoz, Hugo Van Woerden, Margaret Maxwell, Yaling Yang, Trish Gorely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gill HubbardDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland, UK. gill.hubbard@uhi.ac.uk.
Catharine Ward ThompsonOPENspace research centre, University of Edinburgh, 74 Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9DF, UK.
Robert LockePartnerships for Well-Being, 33 Wells Street, Inverness, IV35JU, Scotland.
Dan JenkinsNHS Highland, Larch House, Stoneyfield Business Park, Inverness, IV2 7PA, UK.
Sarah-Anne MunozDivision of Rural Health and Well-being, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, Scotland, UK, IV2 3JH.
Hugo Van WoerdenNHS Highland, Larch House, Stoneyfield Business Park, Inverness, IV2 7PA, UK.
Margaret MaxwellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
Yaling YangNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions need to be developed in a timely and relatively low-cost manner in order to respond to, and quickly address, major public health concerns. We aimed to quickly develop an intervention to support people with severe mental ill-health, that is systematic, well founded both in theory and evidence, without the support of significant funding or resource. In this article we aim to open and elucidate the contents of the 'black box' of intervention development.

methodsA multidisciplinary team of seven academics and health practitioners, together with service user input, developed an intervention in 2018 by scoping the literature, face-to-face meetings, email and telephone. Researcher fieldnotes were analysed to describe how the intervention was developed in four iterative steps.

resultsIn step 1 and 2, scoping the literature showed that, a) people with severe mental illness have high mortality risk in part due to high levels of sedentary behaviour and low levels of exercise; b) barriers to being active include mood, stress, body weight, money, lack of programmes and facilities and stigma c) 'nature walks' has potential as an intervention to address the problem. In Step 3, the team agreed what needed to be included in the intervention so it addressed the "five ways to mental wellbeing" i.e., help people to connect, be active, take notice, keep learning and give. The intervention was mapped to key behavioural change concepts such as, personal relevance, relapse prevention, self-efficacy. In Step 4, the team worked out how best to implement the intervention. The intervention would be delivered over 12 weeks by members of the hospital team and community walk volunteers. Participants would receive a nature walks booklet and text messages.

conclusionsWe developed a theoretically-informed, evidence-based nature walks programme in a timely and relatively low-cost manner relevant in an era of growing mental illness and funding austerity. Further research is required to test if the intervention is effective and if this approach to intervention development works.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesProgram DevelopmentPublic HealthElectronic MailExerciseHumansMental DisordersNatureQuality of LifeSecondary PreventionSedentary BehaviorSeverity of Illness IndexText MessagingWalkingIntervention developmentMental healthNature

Identifiers

PMID32238165
PMCPMC7115083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.