ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020
Development and validation of a survival model for lung adenocarcinoma based on autophagy-associated genes.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prognostic Signature for Lung Adenocarcinoma in Patients Who Have Never Smoked.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Downregulation of GNPNAT1 impaired proliferation and correlates with immune infiltration in lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma in people who have never smoked.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- In-depth exploration of programmed cell death-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature model in lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine Learning for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Article
- Autophagy awakens-the myriad roles of autophagy in head and neck cancer development and therapeutic response.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2022Review
- Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Construction of a Prognostic Nomogram Based on Autophagy-Related Genes for Children With Neuroblastoma.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a survival model for esophageal adenocarcinoma based on autophagy-associated genes.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Gender-specific nomogram models to predict the prognosis of male and female lung adenocarcinoma patients: a population-based analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Risk characteristics with seven epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes are used to predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- A novel prognostic model based on epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes predicts patient survival in gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- A novel autophagy-related lncRNA survival model for lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma based on metabolism-related genes.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- A prognostic nomogram for lung adenocarcinoma based on immune-infiltrating Treg-related genes: from bench to bedside.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- Construction of a Prognostic Model in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Ferroptosis-Related Genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Prediction of Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using an Integrated Model Based on Autophagy Gene Marker.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A novel prognostic models for identifying the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma based on epithelial-mesenchymal transition-associated genes.Bioengineered · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven that abnormal autophagy is involved in the pathogenesis of cancers, we sought to explore the potential value of autophagy-associated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
methodsRNA sequencing and clinical data on tumour and normal samples were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and randomly assigned to training and testing groups. Differentially expressed autophagy-associated genes (AAGs) were screened. Within the training group, Cox regression and Lasso regression analyses were conducted to screen five prognostic AAGs, which were used to develop a model. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the performance of the model in both groups. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate the differential expression of AAGs in tumour and normal tissues at the protein level. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were utilized to further elucidate the roles of AAGs in LUAD.
resultsThe data from the TCGA database included 497 tumour and 54 normal samples, within which 30 differentially expressed AAGs were screened. Using Cox regression and Lasso regression analyses for the training group, 5 prognostic AAGs were identified and the prognostic model was constructed. Patients with low risk had better overall survival (OS) in the training group (3-year OS, 73.0% vs 48.0%; 5-year OS, 45.0% vs 33.8%; P = 1.305E-04) and in the testing group (3-year OS, 66.8% vs 41.2%; 5-year OS, 31.7% vs 25.8%; P = 1.027E-03). The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were significant for both the training and testing groups (3-year AUC, 0.810 vs 0.894; 5-year AUC, 0.792 vs 0.749).
conclusionsWe developed a survival model for LUAD and validated the performance of the model, which may provide superior outcomes for the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.