Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238163›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

Development and validation of a survival model for lung adenocarcinoma based on autophagy-associated genes.

Xiaofei Wang, Shuang Yao, Zengtuan Xiao, Jialin Gong, Zuo Liu, Baoai Han, Zhenfa Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A novel autophagy-related lncRNA survival model for lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaofei WangDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Shuang YaoDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Zengtuan XiaoDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Jialin GongDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Zuo LiuDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Baoai HanDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China.
Zhenfa ZhangDepartment of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin, China. zhangzhenfa@tmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that abnormal autophagy is involved in the pathogenesis of cancers, we sought to explore the potential value of autophagy-associated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

methodsRNA sequencing and clinical data on tumour and normal samples were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and randomly assigned to training and testing groups. Differentially expressed autophagy-associated genes (AAGs) were screened. Within the training group, Cox regression and Lasso regression analyses were conducted to screen five prognostic AAGs, which were used to develop a model. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the performance of the model in both groups. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate the differential expression of AAGs in tumour and normal tissues at the protein level. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were utilized to further elucidate the roles of AAGs in LUAD.

resultsThe data from the TCGA database included 497 tumour and 54 normal samples, within which 30 differentially expressed AAGs were screened. Using Cox regression and Lasso regression analyses for the training group, 5 prognostic AAGs were identified and the prognostic model was constructed. Patients with low risk had better overall survival (OS) in the training group (3-year OS, 73.0% vs 48.0%; 5-year OS, 45.0% vs 33.8%; P = 1.305E-04) and in the testing group (3-year OS, 66.8% vs 41.2%; 5-year OS, 31.7% vs 25.8%; P = 1.027E-03). The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were significant for both the training and testing groups (3-year AUC, 0.810 vs 0.894; 5-year AUC, 0.792 vs 0.749).

conclusionsWe developed a survival model for LUAD and validated the performance of the model, which may provide superior outcomes for the patients.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsAutophagyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisAutophagy-associated genesLUADSurvivalThe Cancer Genome Atlas

Identifiers

PMID32238163
PMCPMC7115085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.