Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32238159›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2020

Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Shahrokh Hatefi, Katayoun Hatefi, Francis Le Roux, Javad Alizargar, Zeinolabedin Behdadipour, Yimesker Yihun, Khaled Abou-El-Hossein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Application and research progress of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial microsomia].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Evaluation of Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Maxillofacial Region.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Two-Axis Continuous Distractor for Mandibular Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Shahrokh HatefiPrecision Engineering Laboratory, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Katayoun HatefiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Esfahan, Iran. katayoun.hatefi@ec.iut.ac.ir.
Francis Le RouxDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Javad AlizargarResearch Center for Healthcare Industry Innovation, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Zeinolabedin BehdadipourSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Esfahan, Iran.
Yimesker YihunRobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, USA.
Khaled Abou-El-HosseinPrecision Engineering Laboratory, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Nelson Mandela University · ZAIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Technology · IRNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science · TWWichita State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is an emerging method for bone tissue reconstruction. In oral and maxillofacial reconstruction applications, DO is playing an important role as a technique without the need of bone graft. In addition, in a DO treatment procedure, a superior outcome could be achieved compared to conventional reconstruction techniques. Recently, a few automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis (ACDO) devices have been designed and developed to be used in human reconstruction applications. Experiments and animal studies have validated the functionality of the developed ACDO devices. It has shown that by using such ACDO devices in a DO procedure, compared to conventional manual DO methods, superior outcomes could be obtained. However, the application of such ACDO devices is still limited. More research and investigation need to be undertaken to study all requirements of ACDO devices to be used in successful human mandibular DO treatment. It is important to determine all requirements and standards that need to be considered and applied in the design and development of ACDO devices. The purpose of this review paper is to highlight the designed and developed ACDO procedures thus far in terms of their working principles, working parameters, and technical aspects for providing a better perspective of the development progress of ACDO devices for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction applications. In this paper, design principles, device specifications, and working parameters of ACDO devices are compared and discussed. Subsequently, current limitations and gaps have been addressed, and future works for enabling an ultimate automatic DO procedure have been suggested.

Indexed as

AutomationHumansMandibular ReconstructionOsteogenesis, DistractionAutomatic continuous distractorDistraction osteogenesisMedical devicesOral and maxillofacial reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID32238159
PMCPMC7110677
OpenAlexW3014498602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.