Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32237745›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2020

MEDICASCY: A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Small-Molecule Drug Side Effects, Indications, Efficacy, and Modes of Action.

Hongyi Zhou, Hongnan Cao, Lilya Matyunina, Madelyn Shelby, Lauren Cassels, John F McDonald, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongyi ZhouCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 950 Atlantic Drive, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Hongnan CaoCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 950 Atlantic Drive, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Lilya MatyuninaSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, United States.
Madelyn ShelbySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, United States.
Lauren CasselsSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, United States.
John F McDonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, United States.
Jeffrey SkolnickCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 950 Atlantic Drive, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-4958

Funding

Purchase of a GPU cluster for deep learning applications in protein-protein interaction and supercomplex prediction and biochemical literature annotation.R35GM118039 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JEFFREY SKOLNICK · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the drug discovery yield, a method which is implemented at the beginning of drug discovery that accurately predicts drug side effects, indications, efficacy, and mode of action based solely on the input of the drug's chemical structure is needed. In contrast, extant predictive methods do not comprehensively address these aspects of drug discovery and rely on features derived from extensive, often unavailable experimental information for novel molecules. To address these issues, we developed MEDICASCY, a multilabel-based boosted random forest machine learning method that only requires the small molecule's chemical structure for the drug side effect, indication, efficacy, and probable mode of action target predictions; however, it has comparable or even significantly better performance than existing approaches requiring far more information. In retrospective benchmarking on high confidence predictions, MEDICASCY shows about 78% precision and recall for predicting at least one severe side effect and 72% precision drug efficacy. Experimental validation of MEDICASCY's efficacy predictions on novel molecules shows close to 80% precision for the inhibition of growth in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer cell lines. Thus, MEDICASCY should improve the success rate for new drug approval. A web service for academic users is available at http://pwp.gatech.edu/cssb/MEDICASCY.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningBenchmarkingCell Line, TumorHumansRetrospective Studiesdrug clinical trialsdrug efficacy predictiondrug side effect predictionindicationmachine learningmode of action protein

Identifiers

PMID32237745
PMCPMC7319183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.