ArticleTransfusion2020
Development of a flow standard to enable highly reproducible measurements of deformability of stored red blood cells in a microfluidic device.
Article in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic Chip Platforms for Red Blood Cell Storage Lesion Quality Control and Precision Transfusion.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- New and emerging technologies for pretransfusion blood quality assessment: A state-of-the-art review.Transfusion · 2024Review
- Big Data in Transfusion Medicine and Artificial Intelligence Analysis for Red Blood Cell Quality Control.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Review
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Microfluidic capillary networks are more sensitive than ektacytometry to the decline of red blood cell deformability induced by storage.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Concurrent Assessment of Deformability and Adhesiveness of Sickle Red Blood Cells by Measuring Perfusion of an Adhesive Artificial Microvascular Network.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGreat deformability allows red blood cells (RBCs) to flow through narrow capillaries in tissues. A number of microfluidic devices with capillary-like microchannels have been developed to monitor storage-related impairment of RBC deformability during blood banking operations. This proof-of-concept study describes a new method to standardize and improve reproducibility of the RBC deformability measurements using one of these devices. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThe rate of RBC flow through the microfluidic capillary network of the microvascular analyzer (MVA) device made of polydimethylsiloxane was measured to assess RBC deformability. A suspension of microbeads in a solution of glycerol in phosphate-buffered saline was developed to be used as an internal flow rate reference alongside RBC samples in the same device. RBC deformability and other in vitro quality markers were assessed weekly in six leukoreduced RBC concentrates (RCCs) dispersed in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol additive solution and stored over 42 days at 4°C.
resultsThe use of flow reference reduced device-to-device measurement variability from 10% to 2%. Repeated-measure analysis using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) method showed a significant monotonic decrease in relative RBC flow rate with storage from Week 0. By the end of storage, relative RBC flow rate decreased by 22 ± 6% on average.
conclusionsThe suspension of microbeads was successfully used as a flow reference to increase reproducibility of RBC deformability measurements using the MVA. Deformability results suggest an early and late aging phase for stored RCCs, with significant decreases between successive weeks suggesting a highly sensitive measurement method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.