Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32237225›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real-World Settings.

Anna L Kratz, Daniel Whibley, Samsuk Kim, David A Williams, Daniel J Clauw, Martin Sliwinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reaction Time in Fibromyalgia Patients.Current rheumatology reviews · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna L KratzUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-3898
Daniel WhibleyUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and School of Medicine, Medical Sciences, and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Samsuk KimUniversity of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan.
David A WilliamsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Daniel J ClauwUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Martin SliwinskiPennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
University of Michigan · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Detroit Mercy · US

Funding

Ambulatory Methods for Measuring Cognitive ChangeU2CAG060408 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SLIWINSKI, MARTIN J · 2018 to 2022
$14.9M
Characteristics and Mechanisms of Cognitive Problems in FibromyalgiaK01AR064275 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KRATZ, ANNA LOUISE · 2014 to 2018
$653k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR064275NIAMS NIH HHS K01AR064275NIA NIH HHS U2C AG060408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePerceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), "fibrofog," is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions has not been explored. In this study, ambulatory assessment methods were used to examine whether FM is related to more environmental distractions and to examine the impact of distractions on subjective and objective cognitive functioning.

methodsFifty people with FM and 50 age-, sex-, and education-matched controls without FM completed 8 consecutive days of ambulatory assessments. Five times per day, participants reported perceived cognitive functioning and environmental distractions and completed validated tests of processing speed and working memory.

resultsThe FM group reported distractions in a higher proportion of the ambulatory cognitive testing sessions (40.5%) compared with the group without FM (29.8%; P < 0.001) and more often reported multiple simultaneous distractions. For both groups, sound was the most common distraction. The group with FM reported more distractions caused by light, and the group without FM reported more social distractions. Group differences in subjective and objective cognitive functioning were not augmented during distraction relative to during periods of no distraction. There were no group differences in within-person changes in cognitive functioning as a function of distraction.

conclusionThe group with FM reported more distractions than the group without FM; both groups reported poorer processing speed when distracted, and the effects of distraction on test performance did not differ significantly by group. Findings suggest that sensitivity to environmental distractions may play a role in the experience of cognitive dysfunction in FM.

Identifiers

PMID32237225
PMCPMC7164629
OpenAlexW3014886680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.