Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32237200›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus persistence in osteoblasts using imaging flow cytometry.

Dafne Bongiorno, Nicolò Musso, Lorenzo Mattia Lazzaro, Gino Mongelli, Stefania Stefani, Floriana Campanile

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Autophagy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The major role ofVirulence · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The osteoblast secretome inFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dafne BongiornoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-0484
Nicolò MussoBio-nanotech Research and Innovation Tower (BRIT), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-1158
Lorenzo Mattia LazzaroDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Gino MongelliDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-2936
Stefania StefaniDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1594-7427
Floriana CampanileDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-5425
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus has been reported as the main pathogen involved in chronic infections, osteomyelitis, and prosthetic joint infections. The host/pathogen interaction is dynamic and requires several changes to promote bacterial survival. Here, we focused on the internalization and persistence behavior of well-characterized Staphylococcus aureus invasive strains belonging to the main ST-MRSA-SCCmec clones. To overcome the limitations of the cell culture method, we comparatively analyzed the ability of internalization within human MG-63 osteoblasts with imaging flow cytometry (IFC). After evaluation by cell culture assay, the MRSA clones in the study were all able to readily internalize at 3h postinfection, the persistence of intracellular bacteria was evaluated at 24h both by routine cell culture and IFC assay, after vancomycin-BODIPY staining. A statistical difference of persistence was found in ST5-SCCmecII (26.59%), ST228-SCCmecI (20.25%), ST8-SCCmecIV (19.52%), ST239-SCCmecIII (47.82%), and ST22-SCCmecIVh (50.55%) showing the same ability to internalize as ATCC12598 (51%), the invasive isolate used as control strain for invasion and persistence assays. We demonstrated that the intracellular persistence process depends on the total number of infected cells. Comparing our data obtained by IFC with those of the cell culture assay, we obtained greater reproducibility rates and a number of intracellular bacteria, with the advantage of analyzing live host cells. Moreover, with some limitations related to the lack of whole-genome sequencing analysis, we validated the different proclivities to persist in the main Italian HA-MRSA invasive isolates and our results highlighted the heterogeneity of the different clones to persist during cell infection.

Indexed as

PhagocytosisCell LineFlow CytometryGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImage CytometryItalyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial ViabilityOsteoblastsReproducibility of ResultsStaphylococcal Infectionsgenetic backgroundimaging flow cytometryinternalizationmethicillin-resistant S. aureusosteoblast

Identifiers

PMID32237200
PMCPMC7221431
OpenAlexW3014480506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.