ArticleApplied clinical informatics2020
Natural Language Processing to Extract Meaningful Information from Patient Experience Feedback.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying natural language processing and machine learning techniques to patient experience feedback: a systematic review.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Pooled it
- How Different Medical Practices Are Associated with Types of Patient Complaints in Russian Clinics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From patient voices to policy: Data analytics reveals patterns in Ontario's hospital feedback.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The impact of AI on modern oncology from early detection to personalized cancer treatment.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Patient Voice and Treatment Nonadherence in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Sentiment Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Article
- 'Your Face, Their Stage': A Global, AI-Enhanced, Mixed-Methods Survey on Public Perceptions of Live Educational Cosmetic Procedures.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- From words to action? A scoping review on automatic sentiment analysis of patient experience comments from online sources and surveys.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- The Use of Natural Language Processing to Interpret Unstructured Patient Feedback on Health Services: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Leveraging AI to Drive Timely Improvements in Patient Experience Feedback: Algorithm Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- An explainable RoBERTa approach to analyzing panic and anxiety sentiment in oral health education YouTube comments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using Natural Language Processing to Explore Patient Perspectives on AI Avatars in Support Materials for Patients With Breast Cancer: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Assessment of Real-Time Natural Language Processing for Improving Diagnostic Specificity: A Prospective, Crossover Exploratory Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Identifying Patients' Preference During Their Hospital Experience. A Sentiment and Topic Analysis of Patient-Experience Comments via Natural Language Techniques.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Large Language Model Prompting Techniques for Advancement in Clinical Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Routine healthcare data for adverse events after spinal surgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Opportunities for the use of large language models in hepatology.Clinical liver disease · 2023Article
- Extracting Pain Care Quality Indicators from U.S. Veterans Health Administration Chiropractic Care Using Natural Language Processing.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Improving Cancer Care Communication: Identifying Sociodemographic Differences in Patient Portal Secure Messages Not Authored by the Patient.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- What Patients Say: Large-Scale Analyses of Replies to the Parkinson's Disease Patient Report of Problems (PD-PROP).Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to reimbursement tied in part to patients' perception of their care, hospitals continue to stress obtaining patient feedback and understanding it to plan interventions to improve patients' experience. We demonstrate the use of natural language processing (NLP) to extract meaningful information from patient feedback obtained through Press Ganey surveys.
methodsThe first step was to standardize textual data programmatically using NLP libraries. This included correcting spelling mistakes, converting text to lowercase, and removing words that most likely did not carry useful information. Next, we converted numeric data pertaining to each category based on sentiment and care aspect into charts. We selected care aspect categories where there were more negative comments for more in-depth study. Using NLP, we made tables of most frequently appearing words, adjectives, and bigrams. Comments with frequent words/combinations underwent further study manually to understand factors contributing to negative patient feedback. We then used the positive and negative comments as the training dataset for a neural network to perform sentiment analysis on sentences obtained by splitting mixed reviews.
resultsWe found that most of the comments were about doctors and nurses, confirming the important role patients ascribed to these two in patient care. "Room," "discharge" and "tests and treatments" were the three categories that had more negative than positive comments. We then tabulated commonly appearing words, adjectives, and two-word combinations. We found that climate control, housekeeping and noise levels in the room, time delays in discharge paperwork, conflicting information about discharge plan, frequent blood draws, and needle sticks were major contributors to negative patient feedback. None of this information was available from numeric data alone.
conclusionNLP is an effective tool to gain insight from raw textual patient feedback to extract meaningful information, making it a powerful tool in processing large amounts of patient feedback efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.