Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236909›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Primary and Secondary Nonresponse Following Bariatric Surgery: a Survey Study in Current Bariatric Practice in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Martine Uittenbogaart, Evelien de Witte, Marleen M Romeijn, Arijan A P M Luijten, Francois M H van Dielen, Wouter K G Leclercq

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmacotherapy and metabolic/bariatric surgery: either or both?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martine UittenbogaartMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands. m.uittenbogaart@mmc.nl.
Evelien de WitteMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marleen M RomeijnMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Arijan A P M LuijtenMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Francois M H van DielenMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Wouter K G LeclercqMáxima Obesity Centre, Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, /Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Máxima Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary nonresponse (1NR) - inability to achieve adequate weight loss after surgery - and secondary nonresponse (2NR) - excessive weight regain after initial adequate weight loss after surgery - can occur in up to 25-35% of patients after bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the variations in both definition as well as management of 1NR and 2NR amongst bariatric surgeons. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn online survey was distributed to all members of the national bariatric societies in the Netherlands and Belgium regarding questions about definition, work-up and treatment of 1NR and 2NR after bariatric surgery.

resultsA total of 45 responses from bariatric surgeons were obtained, representing 32 medical centers that perform bariatric procedures. When assessing 1NR, excess weight loss(EWL) was reported to be used by most respondents(30/45), total body weight loss(TBWL) by 18/45 and body mass index(BMI) by 25/45. A great variation in cut off values was observed. When assessing 2NR, percentage weight gain from the lowest (nadir) weight was preferred most by 22/45 respondents with cut off values varying from 5 to 20%. Most respondents deemed 18 months after initial surgery the most appropriate timeframe to determine 1NR or 2NR.

conclusionsThe current practice regarding primary and secondary nonresponse after bariatric surgery has a wide variety in definitions, work-up and treatment options. Consensus on the definition of 1NR and 2NR is needed to optimize the treatment of bariatric patients.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidBelgiumBody Mass IndexHumansNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryPrimary nonresponseSecondary nonresponseWeight loss failureWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID32236909
OpenAlexW3014586088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.