ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021
Standardized Workflows Improve Colonoscopy Follow-Up After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Safety-Net System.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.Journal of community health · 2021Pooled it
- Characterizing racial disparities in follow-up care after open-access colonoscopy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Article
- Patterns of Care Following a Positive Fecal Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Lack of Adherence to Guidelines on Follow-Up Colonoscopy after an Abnormal Stool Occult Blood Test.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Changes in uptake of stool-based colorectal cancer screening during the Covid-19 pandemic.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- How safety-net health systems can advance equity in gastroenterology and hepatology.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
- An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees.BMC cancer · 2022Observational
- From Cancer Epidemiology to Policy and Practice: the Role of a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Current epidemiology reports · 2022Review
- Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy Completion After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety Net System.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.JAMA health forum · 2020Article
- Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Test Follow-Up: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Federally Qualified Health Center.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHow clinical teams function varies across sites and may affect follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results.
aimsThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of clinical practices associated with higher diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result in a multi-site integrated safety-net system.
methodsWe distributed survey questionnaires about tracking and follow-up of abnormal FIT results to primary care team members across 11 safety-net clinics from January 2017 to April 2017. Surveys were distributed at all-staff clinic meetings and electronic surveys sent to those not in attendance. Participants received up to three reminders to complete the survey.
resultsOf the 501 primary care team members identified, 343 (68.5%) completed the survey. In the four highest-performing clinics, nurse managers identified at least two team members who were responsible for communicating abnormal FIT results to patients. Additionally, team members used a clinic-based registry to track patients with abnormal FIT results until colonoscopy completion. Compared to higher-performing clinics, lower-performing clinics more frequently cited competing health issues (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.03) and lack of patient priority (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) as barriers and were also more likely to discuss abnormal results at a clinic visit (83% vs. 61%, p < 0.01).
conclusionsOur findings suggest organized and dedicated efforts to communicate abnormal FIT results and track patients until colonoscopy completion through registries is associated with improved follow-up. Increased utilization of electronic health record platforms to coordinate communication and navigation may improve diagnostic colonoscopy rates in patients with abnormal FIT results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.