Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236885›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Standardized Workflows Improve Colonoscopy Follow-Up After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Safety-Net System.

Rachel B Issaka, Carly Rachocki, Michael P Huynh, Ellen Chen, Ma Somsouk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel B IssakaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M/S: M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. rissaka@fredhutch.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9691-1655
Carly RachockiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael P HuynhSchool of Public Health, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ellen ChenSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ma SomsoukDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZASan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

UCSF Prevention Research CenterU48DP004998 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIGHTFOOT, MARGUERITA A. · 2014 to 2018
$8.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN DISGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007007 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AVERIL I MA · 1986 to 2026
$6.4M
Developing an intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net population using a mixed methods approachK08CA241296 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ISSAKA, RACHEL B. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP004998NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241296NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007007NIMHD NIH HHS L32 MD012892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow clinical teams function varies across sites and may affect follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results.

aimsThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of clinical practices associated with higher diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result in a multi-site integrated safety-net system.

methodsWe distributed survey questionnaires about tracking and follow-up of abnormal FIT results to primary care team members across 11 safety-net clinics from January 2017 to April 2017. Surveys were distributed at all-staff clinic meetings and electronic surveys sent to those not in attendance. Participants received up to three reminders to complete the survey.

resultsOf the 501 primary care team members identified, 343 (68.5%) completed the survey. In the four highest-performing clinics, nurse managers identified at least two team members who were responsible for communicating abnormal FIT results to patients. Additionally, team members used a clinic-based registry to track patients with abnormal FIT results until colonoscopy completion. Compared to higher-performing clinics, lower-performing clinics more frequently cited competing health issues (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.03) and lack of patient priority (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) as barriers and were also more likely to discuss abnormal results at a clinic visit (83% vs. 61%, p < 0.01).

conclusionsOur findings suggest organized and dedicated efforts to communicate abnormal FIT results and track patients until colonoscopy completion through registries is associated with improved follow-up. Increased utilization of electronic health record platforms to coordinate communication and navigation may improve diagnostic colonoscopy rates in patients with abnormal FIT results.

Indexed as

AftercareAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareSafety-net ProvidersSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkflowColorectal cancerDiagnostic colonoscopyElectronic health recordsFecal immunochemical testStandardized workflows

Identifiers

PMID32236885
PMCPMC7529734
OpenAlexW3014419533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.