ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Role of susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter, strain ratio, and shear wave elastography of the optic nerve in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the role of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective study was done on 55 patients with IIH who underwent SWI of the brain. The images were evaluated by two independent readers for cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and the interobserver agreement between both readers was calculated. The graphic rating scale (GRS) for headache was calculated.
resultsCMBs were found in 16 (29%) of patients with IIH for both readers with excellent interobserver agreement (K = 0.8, p = 0.001). There was excellent interobserver agreement for location (K = 0.8, p = 0.001) and side of CMBs (K = 0.8, p = 0.001). There was good interobserver agreement for size of CMBs (K = 0.75, p = 0.002) and number (K = 0.6, p = 0.006). The mean GRS for headache in patients with CMBs (5.61 ± 1.3) was significantly higher (p = 0.02) than that of patients without CMBs (4.9 ± 0.8).
conclusionWe concluded that SWI can detect CMBs in patients with IIH especially in patients with higher GRS for headache.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.