ReviewPlanta2020
Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects.
Review in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid recombinase polymerase amplification-based detection of theGM crops & food · 2026Article
- From lab to market: industrialization barriers and regulation optimization for new breeding technologies in China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Screening method for detection of genetically modified soybean and maize events using multiplex PCR combined with capillary electrophoresis.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Translating functional molecular knowledge into crop-breeding success.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Thirty years of glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: Current situation and future prospects.Pest management science · 2026Review
- Multiplex PCR Fluorescence Method for Detection of Genetically Modified Maize Strains.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Breeding and Molecular Characterization of Insect-Resistant Transgenic Cotton.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gene Flow and Hybridization Potential Between GM/NGT Crops and Conventional Varieties or Wild Relatives: A Scoping Literature Review with Emphasis on Oilseed Rape (Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Impact of Transgenic Insect-Resistant Maize LD05 on Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Multi-trait improvement of sorghum: co-expression ofaBIOTECH · 2026Article
- Gene Inactivation in Transgenic Plants-A Unique Model for Studying Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A standard-curve-free ΔΔCt method for rapid GMO compliance screening relative to labeling thresholds.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Engaging U.S. experts in environmental oversight of GE crops as it relates to novel biotechnologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cow's Milk Positively Impacts Bone Formation by Regulating the Osteocalcin Pathway Compared to Transgenic and Non-Transgenic Soy-Based Beverages in BALB/c Mice.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Next-generation insect pest management: genetic innovations and emerging biocontrol strategies.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Exploring the role of CRISPR in advancing space biotechnology: challenges and solutions for human survival beyond earth.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effects of Continuous Bt Maize Cultivation on Soil Nutrient Content and Microbial Communities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a duplex chamber digital PCR to quantify twelve genetically modified maize events.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Specific detection of genetically modified potatoes containingGM crops & food · 2025Article
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionWhile transgenic technology has heralded a new era in crop improvement, several concerns have precluded their widespread acceptance. Alternative technologies, such as cisgenesis and genome-editing may address many of such issues and facilitate the development of genetically engineered crop varieties with multiple favourable traits. Genetic engineering and plant transformation have played a pivotal role in crop improvement via introducing beneficial foreign gene(s) or silencing the expression of endogenous gene(s) in crop plants. Genetically modified crops possess one or more useful traits, such as, herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, disease resistance, and nutritional improvement. To date, nearly 525 different transgenic events in 32 crops have been approved for cultivation in different parts of the world. The adoption of transgenic technology has been shown to increase crop yields, reduce pesticide and insecticide use, reduce CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
32236850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.