Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236830›Full record

ArticleOdontology2020

Evaluation of condylar cortical bone thickness in patient groups with different vertical facial dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography.

Antonino Lo Giudice, Lorenzo Rustico, Alberto Caprioglio, Marco Migliorati, Riccardo Nucera

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. nino.logiudice@gmail.com.
Lorenzo RusticoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Section of Orthodontics, University of Messina, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino," Via Consolare Valeria, 98123, Messina, Italy.
Alberto CaprioglioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Orthodontic Programme Chairman, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Marco MiglioratiOrthodontic Department, Genova University, L.go Rosanna Benzi 10, 16100, Genova, Italy.
Riccardo NuceraDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Section of Orthodontics, University of Messina, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino," Via Consolare Valeria, 98123, Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate through computed tomography differences in cortical plate thickness of condyle in patients with a different facial vertical skeletal pattern. The final sample of this retrospective study included CBCT exams of 60 adult subjects (mean age 33.2 ± 5.6), selected from the digital archive of a private practice. The subjects were assigned to 3 different groups according to the values of the Frankfurt-mandibular plane angle: hyper-, normo-, and hypodivergent groups. The volume rendering of the mandible was obtained and three condylar points were marked on it: median pole, lateral pole and the most cranial point. For each considered reference point, the minimum distance between external and internal cortical surface was measured, obtaining three different outcomes: condylar cortical bone thickness of median pole (CCBToMP), lateral pole (CCBToLP) and cranial pole (CCBToCP). The measurements were executed by means of Mimics software by the same expert operator in specific scan views. The cortical bone thickness of hyperdivergent patients was found to be statistically thicker than normodivergent patients and hypodivergent patients. Cortical bone thickness of normodivergent patients was found thicker than hypodivergent patients. All the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the Frankfurt-mandibular plane angle and the evaluated cortical bone thickness outcomes. Facial biotype characteristics that define vertical facial skeletal pattern affect the cortical bone thickness of mandibular condyle.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMandibleAdultCephalometryCortical BoneHumansRetrospective StudiesVertical DimensionATMCondylar cortical boneCone-beam computer tomographyFacial skeletal growthMandibular morphology

Identifiers

PMID32236830
OpenAlexW3014538338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.