Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236766›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

Determination of the target population in early benefit assessments in Germany: challenges for non-small-cell lung cancer.

C Ten Thoren, C Balg, J Gibbert, S Mostardt, M Ripoll, D Schierbaum, S Schiller, A Schwalm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Ten ThorenRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany. corinna.ten-thoren@iqwig.de.
C BalgRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
J GibbertRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
S MostardtRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
M RipollRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
D SchierbaumRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
S SchillerRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.
A SchwalmRessort Versorgung und Gesundheitsökonomie/Dept. of Health Care and Health Economics, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670, Köln, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDossiers submitted for early benefit assessments in Germany also provide information on the precise determination of the target population (patients eligible for a drug). The situation is complex for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to highly specific therapeutic indications. Our aim was to compare the different methodological steps applied to determine the target population in dossiers on drugs for NSCLC.

methodsWe analysed NSCLC dossiers assessed by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) between 01.01.2011 and 31.12.2017. Methodological details regarding the determination of the target population were extracted and compared.

resultsWe analysed 23 NSCLC dossiers. In all dossiers, the target population was determined using the number of all patients with lung cancer as the basis for calculations. This patient population was further reduced in several successive steps by assuming proportions of patients with a specific characteristic (e.g. disease stage). The most important calculation steps were patients with NSCLC (n = 23 dossiers), with a specific disease stage (n = 23), with a specific tumour mutation (n = 14), with a specific tumour histology (n = 7), without prior treatment (n  = 15), with pretreatment in second or further treatment lines (n  = 17), and/or with specific pretreatments (n  = 9). The proportions of patients determined within the same calculation step varied considerably between dossiers. DISCUSSION: The calculation methods applied and the target population sizes reported in NSCLC dossiers vary considerably. A consensus with regard to the databases and calculation methods used to determine the target population in NSCLC would be helpful to reduce variations.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatabases, FactualDrug ApprovalGermanyHumansLung NeoplasmsTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAntineoplastic AgentsEarly benefit assessmentNew drugsNon-small-cell lung cancerNSCLCTarget population

Identifiers

PMID32236766
PMCPMC7366609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.