Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236689›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Free-ranging bats combine three different cognitive processes for roost localization.

Jesús R Hernández-Montero, Christine Reusch, Ralph Simon, Caroline Regina Schöner, Gerald Kerth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesús R Hernández-MonteroZoological Institute and Museum, Applied Zoology and Nature Conservation, Greifswald University, Loitzerstraße 26, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. jesus.hdezmontero@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-0768
Christine ReuschZoological Institute and Museum, Applied Zoology and Nature Conservation, Greifswald University, Loitzerstraße 26, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Ralph SimonDepartment of Ecological Science/Animal Ecology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline Regina SchönerZoological Institute and Museum, Applied Zoology and Nature Conservation, Greifswald University, Loitzerstraße 26, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Gerald KerthZoological Institute and Museum, Applied Zoology and Nature Conservation, Greifswald University, Loitzerstraße 26, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Universität Greifswald · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 409922Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG 2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals have evolved different cognitive processes to localize crucial resources that are difficult to find. Relevant cognitive processes such as associative learning and spatial memory have commonly been studied in a foraging related context under controlled laboratory conditions. However, in natural environments, animals can use multiple cognitive processes to localize resources. In this field study, we used a pairwise choice experiment and automatic roost monitoring to assess how individually marked, free-ranging Bechstein's bats belonging to two different colonies use associative learning, spatial memory and social information when localizing suitable day roosts. To our knowledge, this study tests for the first time how associative learning, spatial memory and social information are used in the process of roost localization in bats under the natural conditions. We show that, when searching for new roosts, bats used associative learning to discriminate between suitable and unsuitable roosts. For re-localizing previously occupied roosts, bats used spatial memory rather than associative learning. Moreover, bats significantly improved the localization of suitable unfamiliar roosts and tended to increase their accuracy to re-localize previously occupied day roosts using social information. Our field experiments suggest that Bechstein's bats make hierarchical use of different cognitive processes when localizing day roosts. More generally, our study underlines that evaluating different cues under natural conditions is fundamental to understanding how natural selection has shaped the cognitive processes used for localizing resources.

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimalsCognitionCuesEnvironmentTimeAssociative learningCognitionMyotis bechsteiniiSocial informationSpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID32236689
PMCPMC7165157
OpenAlexW3014343807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.