Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236623›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2020

Uncovering the potential differentially expressed miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma based on machine learning in The Cancer Genome Atlas database.

Xin Zhao, Jian Dou, Jinglin Cao, Yang Wang, Qingjun Gao, Qiang Zeng, Wenpeng Liu, Baowang Liu, Ziqiang Cui, Liang Teng and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives for systems biology in the management of tuberculosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  14. PD-L1 and Immune Infiltration of mBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin ZhaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Jian DouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Jinglin CaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Yang WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Qingjun GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Qiang ZengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Wenpeng LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Baowang LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Ziqiang CuiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Liang TengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Junhong ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Caiyan ZhaoDepartment of Infection, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify novel diagnostic differentially expressed microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying hepatocellular carcinoma. The expression data of miRNA and mRNA were downloaded for differential expression analysis. Optimal diagnostic differentially expressed miRNA biomarkers were identified via a random forest algorithm. Classification models were established to distinguish patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and normal individuals. A regulatory network between optimal diagnostic differentially expressed miRNA and differentially expressed mRNAs was then constructed. The GSE63046 dataset and in vitro experiments were used to validate the expression of the optimal diagnostic differentially expressed miRNAs identified. In addition, diagnostic and prognostic analyses of optimal diagnostic differentially expressed miRNAs were performed. In total, 14 differentially expressed miRNAs (all upregulated) and 2,982 differentially expressed mRNAs (1,989 upregulated and 993 downregulated) were identified. hsa‑miR‑10b‑5p, hsa‑miR‑10b‑3p, hsa‑miR‑224‑5p, hsa‑miR‑183‑5p and hsa‑miR‑182‑5p were considered as the optimal diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. The mRNAs targeted by these five miRNAs included secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1), endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB), nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 (NR4A3), four and a half LIM domains 2 (FHL2), NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3‑1), interleukin 6 signal transducer (IL6ST) and forkhead box O1 (FOXO1). 'Bile acid biosynthesis and cholesterol' was the most enriched signaling pathways of these target mRNAs. The expression validation of the five miRNAs was consistent with the present bioinformatics analysis. Notably, hsa‑miR‑10b‑5p and hsa‑miR‑10b‑3p had a significant prognosis value for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In conclusion, the five differentially expressed miRNAs may be considered as diagnostic biomarkers for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, the differential expression levels of the targets of these five mRNAs, including SFRP1, EDNRB, NR4A3, FHL2, NKX3‑1, IL6ST and FOXO1, may be involved in hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularDatabases, GeneticEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsdiagnosisdifferentially expressed microRNAshepatocellular carcinomamachine learningprognosis

Identifiers

PMID32236623
PMCPMC7160538
OpenAlexW3011675492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.