Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236529›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Survival Model With Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.

Hsien Seow, Peter Tanuseputro, Lisa Barbera, Craig Earle, Dawn Guthrie, Sarina Isenberg, Rosalyn Juergens, Jeffrey Myers, Melissa Brouwers, Rinku Sutradhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of Predictive Models for Survival among Women with Breast Cancer in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Promising Advances in LINC01116 Related to Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hsien SeowDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa BarberaDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Craig EarleInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dawn GuthrieDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Sarina IsenbergTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rosalyn JuergensDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey MyersDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa BrouwersUniversity of Ottawa School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rinku SutradharInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 379009CIHR 383402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Existing prognostic cancer tools include biological and laboratory variables. However, patients often do not know this information, preventing them from using the tools and understanding their prognosis. Objective: To develop and validate a prognostic survival model for all cancer types that incorporates information on symptoms and performance status over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, population-based, prognostic study of data from patients diagnosed with cancer from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, in Ontario, Canada. Patients were randomly selected for model derivation (60%) and validation (40%). The derivation cohort was used to develop a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model with baseline characteristics under a backward stepwise variable selection process to predict the risk of mortality as a function of time. Covariates included demographic characteristics, clinical information, symptoms and performance status, and health care use. Model performance was assessed on the validation cohort by C statistics and calibration plots. Data analysis was performed from February 6, 2018, to November 6, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death from diagnosis (year 0) recalculated at each of 4 annual survivor marks after diagnosis (up to year 4). Results: A total of 255 494 patients diagnosed with cancer were identified (135 699 [53.1%] female; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]). The cohort decreased to 217 055, 184 822, 143 649, and 109 569 patients for each of the 4 years after diagnosis. In the derivation cohort year 0, and the most common cancers were breast (30 855 [20.1%]), lung (19 111 [12.5%]), and prostate (18 404 [12.0%]). A total of 47 614 (31.1%) had stage III or IV disease. The mean (SD) time to death in year 0 was 567 (715) days. After backward stepwise selection in year 0, the following factors were associated with increased risk of death by more than 10%: being hospitalized; having congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or dementia; having moderate to high pain; having worse well-being; having functional status in the transitional or end-of-life phase; having any problems with appetite; receiving end-of-life home care; and living in a nursing home. Model discrimination was high for all models (C statistic: 0.902 [year 0], 0.912 [year 1], 0.912 [year 2], 0.909 [year 3], and 0.908 [year 4]). Conclusions and Relevance: The model accurately predicted changing cancer survival risk over time using clinical, symptom, and performance status data and appears to have the potential to be a useful prognostic tool that can be completed by patients. This knowledge may support earlier integration of palliative care.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHeart FailureHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOntarioPalliative CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32236529
PMCPMC7113728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.