Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236524›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2020

Canfam_GSD: De novo chromosome-length genome assembly of the German Shepherd Dog (Canis lupus familiaris) using a combination of long reads, optical mapping, and Hi-C.

Matt A Field, Benjamin D Rosen, Olga Dudchenko, Eva K F Chan, Andre E Minoche, Richard J Edwards, Kirston Barton, Ruth J Lyons, Daniel Enosi Tuipulotu, Vanessa M Hayes and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. A 120-y time series of genomes reveals the consequences of closed breeding in German Shepherd Dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Matt A FieldCentre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Smithfield Road, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia.
Benjamin D RosenAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service USDA, Baltimore Ave, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Olga DudchenkoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Eva K F ChanGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Andre E Minoche
Richard J EdwardsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
Kirston BartonGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Ruth J LyonsGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Daniel Enosi TuipulotuSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
Vanessa M HayesGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Arina D OmerThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Zane ColaricThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jens KeilwagenJulius Kühn-Institut, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany.
Ksenia SkvortsovaGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Ozren BogdanovicGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Martin A SmithGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Erez Lieberman AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Timothy P L SmithUS Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service USDA, Rd 313, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.
Robert A ZammitVineyard Veterinary Hospital, Windsor Rd, Vineyard, NSW 2765, Australia.
J William O BallardSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, High St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.

Funding

GENOME WIDE MAPPING OF LOOPS USING IN SITU HI-CUM1HG009375 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
Supplement - Beyond pairwise DNA contacts: exploring higher-order genome structure using proximity ligationU01HL130010 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009375NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL130010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German Shepherd Dog (GSD) is one of the most common breeds on earth and has been bred for its utility and intelligence. It is often first choice for police and military work, as well as protection, disability assistance, and search-and-rescue. Yet, GSDs are well known to be susceptible to a range of genetic diseases that can interfere with their training. Such diseases are of particular concern when they occur later in life, and fully trained animals are not able to continue their duties.

findingsHere, we provide the draft genome sequence of a healthy German Shepherd female as a reference for future disease and evolutionary studies. We generated this improved canid reference genome (CanFam_GSD) utilizing a combination of Pacific Bioscience, Oxford Nanopore, 10X Genomics, Bionano, and Hi-C technologies. The GSD assembly is ∼80 times as contiguous as the current canid reference genome (20.9 vs 0.267 Mb contig N50), containing far fewer gaps (306 vs 23,876) and fewer scaffolds (429 vs 3,310) than the current canid reference genome CanFamv3.1. Two chromosomes (4 and 35) are assembled into single scaffolds with no gaps. BUSCO analyses of the genome assembly results show that 93.0% of the conserved single-copy genes are complete in the GSD assembly compared with 92.2% for CanFam v3.1. Homology-based gene annotation increases this value to ∼99%. Detailed examination of the evolutionarily important pancreatic amylase region reveals that there are most likely 7 copies of the gene, indicative of a duplication of 4 ancestral copies and the disruption of 1 copy.

conclusionsGSD genome assembly and annotation were produced with major improvement in completeness, continuity, and quality over the existing canid reference. This resource will enable further research related to canine diseases, the evolutionary relationships of canids, and other aspects of canid biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomesDogsGenomeGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome Sequencingcanine hip dysplasiade novo genome assemblyDNA ZooHi-Clong-read sequencingoptical mapping

Identifiers

PMID32236524
PMCPMC7111595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.