Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236352›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2020

Limitation of diagnostic value of cone-beam CT in detecting apical root isthmuses.

Elen de Souza Tolentino, Pablo Andrés Amoroso-Silva, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Heitor Marques Honório, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki, Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen, Marco Antônio Húngaro-Duarte

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distortion or magnification? AnDento maxillo facial radiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elen de Souza TolentinoUniversidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Odontologia, Maringá, Paraná, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-4694
Pablo Andrés Amoroso-SilvaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5112-6162
Murilo Priori AlcaldeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Dentística, Endodontia e Materiais Odontológicos, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-065X
Heitor Marques HonórioUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Odontopediatria, Ortodontia e Saúde Coletiva, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0231-3409
Lilian Cristina Vessoni IwakiUniversidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Odontologia, Maringá, Paraná, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-3056
Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-BullenUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Cirurgia, Estomatologia, Patologia e Radiologia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-9433
Marco Antônio Húngaro-DuarteUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Dentística, Endodontia e Materiais Odontológicos, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-737X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIsthmuses are reported as common anatomic complexities in teeth often associated with failures in endodontic treatment. They should be considered before starting treatment and a preoperative computed tomography scan (CT) may demonstrate these complexities.

objectiveTo assess the diagnostic value of the highest resolution settings of a cone-beam CT (CBCT) system in identifying and measuring apical isthmuses, using micro-CT as reference. METHODOLOGY: After micro-CT scanning, 40 humans' lower first molars with isthmuses in the apical-3 mm of mesial roots were scanned by the highest resolution settings of the New Generation i-Cat ® CBCT equipment. Two blinded observers recorded the detection of isthmuses in CBCT scans. The lengths of isthmuses were compared between micro-CT and CBCT to assess the diagnostic value of CBCT. Quantitative data for sensitivity were represented as percentages (95% confidence interval). The Bland-Altman method was used to assess differences between gold standard lengths (micro-CT) and CBCT lengths.

resultsBCT demonstrated 30 positive findings, representing sensitivity for isthmus identification of 75% (95% CI=0.4114-1.1364). Differences between the lengths in micro-CT (1.99±0.40 mm) and CBCT (1.53±0.41 mm) were significant (p<0.0001).

conclusionThe CBCT device used presented limited diagnostic value in the identification and measurement of apical isthmuses in the mesial roots of lower molars. In some cases, the actual anatomy of the apical root canal may not be completely delineated in this type of CBCT system, even using the highest resolution settings.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMolarObserver VariationOrgan SizeReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRoot Canal TherapySensitivity and SpecificityTooth ApexTooth Root

Identifiers

PMID32236352
PMCPMC7105288
OpenAlexW3013414726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.