Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236290›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2020

Conservation of both hematocrit and liver regeneration in hepatectomies: a vascular occlusion approach in rats.

Eduardo Augustus Malinowski, Jorge Eduardo Fouto Matias, Ana Paula Percicote, Thaísa Nakadomari, Rogério Robes, Ricardo Rasmussen Petterle, Lúcia De Noronha, Jose Luiz De Godoy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. BAR, SOFT AND DRI POST-HEPATIC TRANSPLANTATION: WHAT IS THE BEST FOR SURVIVAL ANALYSIS?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eduardo Augustus MalinowskiHealth Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-8605
Jorge Eduardo Fouto MatiasDepartment of Surgery, Health Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-8870
Ana Paula PercicotePathology Department, Health Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-0195
Thaísa NakadomariDepartment of Surgery, Health Sciences Sector.
Rogério RobesVeterinary Medicine, Agricultural Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-6370
Ricardo Rasmussen PetterleStatistics, Health Sciences Sector; Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7735-1077
Lúcia De NoronhaPathology Department, Health Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0310-7164
Jose Luiz De GodoyDepartment of Surgery, Health Sciences Sector.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6703-9546
United States Department of Labor · USIndependent Sector · USDepartment of Agricultural Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatectomies promote considerable amount of blood loss and the need to administrate blood products, which are directly linked to higher morbimortality rates. The blood-conserving hepatectomy (BCH) is a modification of the selective vascular occlusion technique. It could be a surgical maneuver in order to avoid or to reduce the blood products utilization in the perioperative period.

aimTo evaluate in rats the BCH effects on the hematocrit (HT) variation, hemoglobin serum concentration (HB), and on liver regeneration.

methodsTwelve Wistar rats were divided into two groups: control (n=6) and intervention (n=6). The ones in the control group had their livers partially removed according to the Higgins and Anderson technique, while the rats in the treatment group were submitted to BCH technique. HT and HB levels were measured at day D0, D1 and D7. The rate between the liver and rat weights was calculated in D0 and D7. Liver regeneration was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated.

resultsThe HT and HB levels were lower in the control group as of D1 onwards, reaching an 18% gap at D7 (p=0.01 and p=0.008, respectively); BCH resulted in the preservation of HT and HB levels to the intervention group rats. BCH did not alter liver regeneration in rats.

conclusionThe BCH led to beneficial effects over the postoperative HT and serum HB levels with no setbacks to liver regeneration. These data are the necessary proof of evidence for translational research into the surgical practice. A) Unresected liver; B) liver appearance after the partial hepatectomy (1=vena cava; 2=portal vein; 3=hepatic vein; 4=biliary drainage; 5=hepatic artery).

Indexed as

Liver RegenerationAnimalsBlood VolumeHematocritHemoglobinsHepatectomyHepatic Veno-Occlusive DiseaseLiverMalePortal VeinPostoperative PeriodRatsRats, WistarVeinsHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID32236290
PMCPMC7099868
OpenAlexW3014301449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.