Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Performance of volunteer community health workers in implementing home-fortification interventions in Bangladesh: A qualitative investigation.

Haribondhu Sarma, Ishrat Jabeen, Sharmin Khan Luies, Md Fakhar Uddin, Tahmeed Ahmed, Thomas J Bossert, Cathy Banwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Haribondhu SarmaResearch School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-8498
Ishrat JabeenNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sharmin Khan LuiesNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Fakhar UddinNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Thomas J BossertThe Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Cathy BanwellResearch School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDAustralian National University · AUHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBRAC, an international development organisation based in Bangladesh, uses female volunteer community health workers called Shasthya Shebika (SS), who receive small incentives to implement its home-fortification interventions at the community level. This paper examines the individual, community and BRAC work environment factors that exert an influence on the performance of SS.

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted between the period of June 2014 to December 2016 as part of a larger evaluation of BRAC's home-fortification programme. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews and analysed thematically. The participants were SS and their supervisors working for BRAC, caregivers of children aged 6-59 months, husbands of SS, village doctors, and Upazila Health and Family Planning Officers.

resultsYounger, better educated and more experienced SS with positive self-efficacy were perceived to have performed better than their peers. Social and community factors, such as community recognition of the SS's services, social and religious norms, family support, and household distance, also affected the performance of the SS. There were several challenges at the programme and organisational level that needed to be addressed, including appropriate recruitment, timely basic training and income-generation guidance for the SS.

conclusionBRAC's volunteer SS model faces challenges at individual, community, programme and organisational level. Importantly, BRAC's SS require a living wage to earn essential income for their family. Considering the current socio-cultural and economic context of Bangladesh, BRAC may need to revise the existing volunteer SS model to ensure that SS receive an adequate income so that they can devote themselves to implementing its home-fortification intervention.

Indexed as

Nutritional SupportAdultBangladeshChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentSelf EfficacySocial SupportVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID32236114
PMCPMC7112190
OpenAlexW3014219112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.