Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32236112›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The development of the Japanese version of the compassionate engagement and action scales.

Kenichi Asano, Yasuhiro Kotera, Masao Tsuchiya, Ikuo Ishimura, Shuzhen Lin, Yuki Matsumoto, Marcela Matos, Jaskaran Basran, Paul Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenichi AsanoDepartment of Psychological Counseling, Mejiro University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3839-5733
Yasuhiro KoteraOnline Learning, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-0085
Masao TsuchiyaResearch Department, Advantage Risk Management Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Ikuo IshimuraFaculty of Applied Psychology, Tokyo Seitoku University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuzhen LinGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yuki MatsumotoHuman Life Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan.
Marcela MatosCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Interventions (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jaskaran BasranCollege of Health and Social Care Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Paul GilbertCollege of Health and Social Care Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-9892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few years have seen increasing research on self-report measures of compassion. The Compassionate Engagement and Action Scale (CEAS) is rooted in an evolutionary approach to compassion, which focuses on the competencies of compassion those are engagement with distress or suffering, and taking action to alleviate and prevent it. This study sought to validate the CEAS in a Japanese population using a cross-sectional design. A total of 279 students (82 males, 191 females, 6 unknown) answered self-report questionnaires, including the Japanese version of CEAS. We found single-factor structures for compassion for others scales, compassion from others scales, and compassion for self scales. All scales were found to have acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and construct validity. Even though some limitations, these results indicate that the Japanese version of CEAS is an adequately constructed and useful measure to assess compassionate engagement and action toward others, from others, and for the self with Japanese population.

Indexed as

EmpathyPsychometricsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32236112
PMCPMC7112184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.