Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235907›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

Electronic health records and polygenic risk scores for predicting disease risk.

Ruowang Li, Yong Chen, Marylyn D Ritchie, Jason H Moore

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05515653 (Impact of the Genetic Background as a Risk Factor for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Brazilian Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05515653 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of the Genetic Background as a Risk Factor for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Brazilian Population

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Alemão Oswaldo CruzRan2022 to 2024Enrolled3,974ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Acute MI, Stroke, Peripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsExposure to genetics (polygenic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards a new taxonomy of preterm birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruowang LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-4253
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason H MooreDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jhmoore@upenn.edu.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Biomedical Computing and Informatics Strategies for Infectious Disease ResearchR01AI116794 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116794NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of disease risk based on the genetic make-up of an individual is essential for effective prevention and personalized treatment. Nevertheless, to date, individual genetic variants from genome-wide association studies have achieved only moderate prediction of disease risk. The aggregation of genetic variants under a polygenic model shows promising improvements in prediction accuracies. Increasingly, electronic health records (EHRs) are being linked to patient genetic data in biobanks, which provides new opportunities for developing and applying polygenic risk scores in the clinic, to systematically examine and evaluate patient susceptibilities to disease. However, the heterogeneous nature of EHR data brings forth many practical challenges along every step of designing and implementing risk prediction strategies. In this Review, we present the unique considerations for using genotype and phenotype data from biobank-linked EHRs for polygenic risk prediction.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMultifactorial InheritanceAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGenotypeHumansPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.