Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235807›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Diagnosis of Mucopolysaccharidoses.

Francyne Kubaski, Fabiano de Oliveira Poswar, Kristiane Michelin-Tirelli, Maira Graeff Burin, Diana Rojas-Málaga, Ana Carolina Brusius-Facchin, Sandra Leistner-Segal, Roberto Giugliani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francyne KubaskiPostgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9330-0154
Fabiano de Oliveira PoswarPostgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-2876
Kristiane Michelin-TirelliMedical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil.
Maira Graeff BurinMedical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1633-8941
Diana Rojas-MálagaPostgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8107-7621
Ana Carolina Brusius-FacchinMedical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil.
Sandra Leistner-SegalMedical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-6168
Roberto GiuglianiPostgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRNational Institute on Population Medical Genetics · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 405495/2018-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465549/2014-4Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.136366/2017-00FIPE-HCPA 17-0445Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 17/2551-0000521-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) include 11 different conditions caused by specific enzyme deficiencies in the degradation pathway of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Although most MPS types present increased levels of GAGs in tissues, including blood and urine, diagnosis is challenging as specific enzyme assays are needed for the correct diagnosis. Enzyme assays are usually performed in blood, with some samples (as leukocytes) providing a final diagnosis, while others (such as dried blood spots) still being considered as screening methods. The identification of variants in the specific genes that encode each MPS-related enzyme is helpful for diagnosis confirmation (when needed), carrier detection, genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis (preferably in combination with enzyme assays) and phenotype prediction. Although the usual diagnostic flow in high-risk patients starts with the measurement of urinary GAGs, it continues with specific enzyme assays and is completed with mutation identification; there is a growing trend to have genotype-based investigations performed at the beginning of the investigation. In such cases, confirmation of pathogenicity of the variants identified should be confirmed by measurement of enzyme activity and/or identification and/or quantification of GAG species. As there is a growing number of countries performing newborn screening for MPS diseases, the investigation of a low enzyme activity by the measurement of GAG species concentration and identification of gene mutations in the same DBS sample is recommended before the suspicion of MPS is taken to the family. With specific therapies already available for most MPS patients, and with clinical trials in progress for many conditions, the specific diagnosis of MPS as early as possible is becoming increasingly necessary. In this review, we describe traditional and the most up to date diagnostic methods for mucopolysaccharidoses.

Indexed as

enzyme replacement therapyglycosaminoglycansmucopolysaccharidosesnewborn screening.tandem mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID32235807
PMCPMC7151013
OpenAlexW3012794949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.