Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235691›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Non-Coding microRNAs as Novel Potential Tumor Markers in Testicular Cancer.

Manuel Regouc, Gazanfer Belge, Anja Lorch, Klaus-Peter Dieckmann, Martin Pichler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exosomal ncRNAs in reproductive cancers†.Biology of reproduction · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic Factors and ncRNAs in Testicular Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Manuel RegoucResearch Unit of Non-Coding RNAs and Genome Editing in Cancers, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-8103
Gazanfer BelgeFaculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-3450
Anja LorchDepartment of Medical Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zuerich, Switzerland.
Klaus-Peter DieckmannDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-7956
Martin PichlerResearch Unit of Non-Coding RNAs and Genome Editing in Cancers, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-9462
Asklepios Klinik Altona · DEMedical University of Graz · ATThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular cancer is an important disease with increasing incidence and a high burden of morbidity and mortality in young men worldwide. Histological examination of the testicular tissue after orchiectomy plays an important role alongside patient history, imaging, clinical presentation and laboratory parameters. Surgical procedures and chemotherapeutic treatment provide a high chance of cure in early stages, though some patients in advanced stages belonging to a poor risk group experience cancer-related death. Though conventional serum-based tumor markers, including α-fetoprotein (AFP), the β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), are useful as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers, unfortunately, these tumor markers only have a sensitivity of about 60%, and in pure seminoma even lower with about 20%. Therefore, the development of new tumor markers is an important and intensively ongoing issue. The analysis of epigenetic modification and non-coding RNA microRNAs (miRNAs) are carrying most promising potential as tumor markers in future. miRNAs are small RNAs secreted by testicular tumor cells and circulate and be measurable in body fluids. In recent years, miRNAs of the miR-371-373 cluster in particular have been identified as potentially superior tumor markers in testicular cancer patients. Studies showed that miR-371a-3p and miR-302/367 expression significantly differ between testicular tumors and healthy testicular tissue. Several studies including high prospective multi-center trials clearly demonstrated that these miRNAs significantly exceed the sensitivity and specificity of conventional tumor markers and may help to facilitate the diagnosis, follow-up, and early detection of recurrences in testicular cancer patients. In addition, other miRNAs such as miR-223-3p, miR-449, miR-383, miR-514a-3p, miR-199a-3p, and miR-214 will be discussed in this review. However, further studies are needed to identify the value of these novel markers in additional clinical scenarios, including the monitoring in active surveillance or after adjuvant chemotherapy, but also to show the limitations of these tumor markers. The aim of this review is to give an overview on the current knowledge regarding the relevance of non-coding miRNAs as biomarkers in testicular cancer.

Indexed as

microRNAstesticular cancertumor markers

Identifiers

PMID32235691
PMCPMC7140096
OpenAlexW3011778928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.