Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235647›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Cholangiocarcinoma Disease Modelling Through Patients Derived Organoids.

Francesco Amato, Colin Rae, Maria Giuseppina Prete, Chiara Braconi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Patient-Derived Organoids of Cholangiocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Patient-Derived Organoids as a Model for Cancer Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco AmatoInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
Colin RaeInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
Maria Giuseppina PreteInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
Chiara BraconiInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer organoids are 3D phenotypic cultures that can be established from resected or biopsy tumour samples and can be grown as mini tumours in the dish. Flourishing evidence supports the feasibility of patient derived organoids (PDO) from a number of solid tumours. Evidence for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) PDO is still sparse but growing. CCA PDO lines have been established from resected early stage disease, advanced cancers and highly chemorefractory tumours. Cancer PDO was shown to recapitulate the 3D morphology, genomic landscape and transcriptomic profile of the source counterpart. They proved to be a valued model for drug discovery and sensitivity testing, and they showed to mimic the drug response observed in vivo in the patients. However, PDO lack representation of the intratumour heterogeneity and the tumour-stroma interaction. The efficiency rate of CCA PDO within the three different subtypes, intrahepatic, perihilar and distal, is still to be explored. In this manuscript we will review evidence for CCA PDO highlighting advantages and limitations of this novel disease model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaHumansOrganoidsbiliary cancerCCAorganoidPDOpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID32235647
PMCPMC7226733
OpenAlexW3013379962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.