Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235589›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

Uncovering Prognosis-Related Genes and Pathways by Multi-Omics Analysis in Lung Cancer.

Ken Asada, Kazuma Kobayashi, Samuel Joutard, Masashi Tubaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Ken Takasawa, Masaaki Komatsu, Syuzo Kaneko, Jun Sese, Ryuji Hamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identification of Clinically Relevant Genes Using Machine Learning Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Aging · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What is circulating factor disease and how is it currently explained?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ken AsadaCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-4449
Kazuma KobayashiCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Samuel JoutardCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Masashi TubakiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Research Center, 2-3-26, Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan.
Satoshi TakahashiCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Ken TakasawaCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8699-0858
Masaaki KomatsuCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Syuzo KanekoDivision of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Jun SeseDivision of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Ryuji HamamotoCancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.

Funding

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan the Public/Private R&D Investment Strategic Expansion Program (PRISM)Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR1689Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18H04908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Therefore, understanding the factors linked to patient survival is essential. Recently, multi-omics analysis has emerged, allowing for patient groups to be classified according to prognosis and at a more individual level, to support the use of precision medicine. Here, we combined RNA expression and miRNA expression with clinical information, to conduct a multi-omics analysis, using publicly available datasets (the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) focusing on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)). We were able to successfully subclass patients according to survival. The classifiers we developed, using inferred labels obtained from patient subtypes showed that a support vector machine (SVM), gave the best classification results, with an accuracy of 0.82 with the test dataset. Using these subtypes, we ranked genes based on RNA expression levels. The top 25 genes were investigated, to elucidate the mechanisms that underlie patient prognosis. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the expression levels of six out of 25 genes (

Indexed as

GenomicsAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSupport Vector MachineUnsupervised Machine Learninglung cancermulti-omics analysissurvival-associated genes

Identifiers

PMID32235589
PMCPMC7225957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.