Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235552›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Confusion and Anxiety Following Breast Density Notification: Fact or Fiction?

Evenda K Dench, Ellie C Darcey, Louise Keogh, Kirsty McLean, Sarah Pirikahu, Christobel Saunders, Sandra Thompson, Catherine Woulfe, Elizabeth Wylie, Jennifer Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Women's Reactions to Breast Density Information Vary by Sociodemographic Characteristics.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evenda K DenchCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.
Ellie C DarceyCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.
Louise KeoghCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kirsty McLeanCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.
Sarah PirikahuCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.
Christobel SaundersSchool of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sandra ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 6009 Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-7155
Catherine WoulfeCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.
Elizabeth WylieSchool of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jennifer StoneCentre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5077-0124

Funding

Cancer Australia APP1085750Cancer Council Western Australia APP1085750Commonwealth of Australia Public Health and Chronic Disease Grant Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of evidence-based screening recommendations for women with dense breasts, it is important to know if breast density notification increases women's anxiety. This study describes psychological reactions and future screening intentions of women attending a public mammographic screening program in Western Australia. Two-thirds of notified women indicated that knowing their breast density made them feel informed, 21% described feeling anxious, and 23% confused. Of the notified women who reported anxiety, 96% intended to re-screen when due (compared to 91% of all notified women and 93% of controls;

Indexed as

anxietybreast cancer screeningbreast densitybreast density notificationscreening intentions

Identifiers

PMID32235552
PMCPMC7230559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.