Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235539›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Optimal Body Mass Index Cut-off Point for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival in an Asian Population: A National Health Information Database Analysis.

Nan Song, Dan Huang, Doeun Jang, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Aesun Shin, Ji Won Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Operational Definitions of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean National Health Insurance Database.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan SongCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-1060
Dan HuangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0956-780X
Doeun JangCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-6792
Min Jung KimCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-9633
Seung-Yong JeongCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Aesun ShinCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-1969
Ji Won ParkCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-8175

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2017R1A2B4009233Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal body mass index (BMI) range for predicting survival in Asian colorectal cancer patients is unknown. We established the most appropriate cut-off point of BMI to predict better survival in Asian colorectal cancer patients using a two-stage approach. Two cohorts of colorectal cancer patients were included in this study: 5815 hospital-based development cohort and 54,043 nationwide validation cohort. To determine the optimal BMI cut-off point at diagnosis, the method of Contal and O'Quigley was used. We evaluated the association between BMI and overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazard model. During a median follow-up of 5.7 and 5.1 years for the development and the validation cohort, 1180 (20.3%) and 10,244 (19.0%) deaths occurred, respectively. The optimal cut-off of BMI identified as 20.2 kg/m

Indexed as

body mass indexcolorectal cancercut-off pointsurvival

Identifiers

PMID32235539
PMCPMC7226173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.