Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235320›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

A Proof-of-Concept Fragment Screening of a Hit-Validated 96-Compounds Library against Human Carbonic Anhydrase II.

Steffen Glöckner, Andreas Heine, Gerhard Klebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steffen GlöcknerInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Andreas HeineInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Gerhard KlebeInstitute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragment screening is a powerful tool to identify and characterize binding pockets in proteins. We herein present the results of a proof-of-concept screening campaign of a versatile 96-entry fragment library from our laboratory against the drug target and model protein human carbonic anhydrase II. The screening revealed a novel chemotype for carbonic anhydrase inhibition, as well as less common non-covalent interaction types and unexpected covalent linkages. Lastly, different runs of the PanDDA tool reveal a practical hint for its application.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCarbonic Anhydrase IIDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSmall Molecule LibrariesCarbonic Anhydrase IISmall Molecule Libraries96-compounds fragment librarycovalent modificationfragment screeninghuman carbonic anhydrase IIPanDDAZnII coordination

Identifiers

PMID32235320
PMCPMC7226012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.