ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2020
Preventing forgotten double J ureteral stents in a high-volume service medical center: An autoregistration monitoring system.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current application of blockchain technology in healthcare and its potential roles in Urology.BJU international · 2025Pooled it
- Application of Omaha system-based continuing care in patients with retained double J tube after urinary calculus surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Risks of forgotten double-J ureteric stents after ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of an autoregistration monitoring system (ARMS) for tracking the placement and removal of ureteral stents.
methodsThe system was designed to tie in closely with the billing system. Once a stent was used and charged, a stent "episode" was created in the ARMS. When the stent was removed and the charge for the procedure was issued, the stent episode for that stent was removed automatically. The ARMS identified stents which exceeded their deadline, generating an alarm until the stent was removed and the ARMS updated.
resultsA total of 10 105 patients with 12 440 stent episodes were registered in the ARMS between March 2010 and August 2018. Of the 10 105 patients, 8597 (85.07%) were automatically detected to have had their stents removed before their deadline. We contacted the 1508 (14.93%) patients whose stents were not registered as having been removed by their deadline, of whom 122 (1.21%) had undergone stent removal at other hospitals, 490 (4.85%) had died, and 875 (8.66%) knew that they had ureteral stents inserted and were urged to come back for stent removal. Twenty-one patients (0.21%) did not know that they had implanted stents. None of these 21 patients were urological patients, and they had stents placed during urological consultation in an operating room.
conclusionOur study showed that the ARMS reduced the manpower in tracking stent removal by 85.07% and that it was useful for detecting and preventing forgotten stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.