Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235174›Full record

ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2020

A Narrative Review of Current Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Bacterial Vaginosis.

Christina A Muzny, Przemyslaw Kardas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Randomized trial of multi-strainContemporary clinical trials communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The activity of cell-free supernatant ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina A MuznyFrom the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Przemyslaw KardasDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI133789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of a number of oral and intravaginal antibiotic medications for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV), management of this condition remains challenging. Recurrent BV occurs in >50% of patients receiving guideline-recommended treatments. This may be due to persistence or resurgence of the BV biofilm after treatment cessation, failure to reestablish an optimal vaginal microbiome after treatment, reinfection from an untreated sexual partner, or a combination of these factors. Nonadherence to multidose BV therapies may potentially contribute to recurrent BV, although there are no published data that directly assess the role of nonadherence to poor treatment outcomes and recurrent BV. There is a need for studies of BV treatment adherence in real-world settings as well as studies to explore the relationship between treatment adherence and recurrence. This review explores challenges associated with diagnosing and treating BV, current multidose antibiotic treatment options, newer single-dose treatment options, and ways to potentially maximize treatment success for this common vaginal infection.

Indexed as

Vaginosis, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMicrobiotaTreatment OutcomeVaginaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32235174
PMCPMC7294746
OpenAlexW3014744244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.