Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32234779›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Reward-Based Improvements in Motor Control Are Driven by Multiple Error-Reducing Mechanisms.

Olivier Codol, Peter J Holland, Sanjay G Manohar, Joseph M Galea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incentive valence differentially engages open- and closed-loop basal ganglia circuits during movement initiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivier CodolSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom codol.olivier@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0796-5457
Peter J HollandSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8591-3575
Sanjay G ManoharNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-4349
Joseph M GaleaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-4049

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P00878X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward has a remarkable ability to invigorate motor behavior, enabling individuals to select and execute actions with greater precision and speed. However, if reward is to be exploited in applied settings, such as rehabilitation, a thorough understanding of its underlying mechanisms is required. In a series of experiments, we first demonstrate that reward simultaneously improves the selection and execution components of a reaching movement. Specifically, reward promoted the selection of the correct action in the presence of distractors, while also improving execution through increased speed and maintenance of accuracy. These results led to a shift in the speed-accuracy functions for both selection and execution. In addition, punishment had a similar impact on action selection and execution, although it enhanced execution performance across all trials within a block, that is, its impact was noncontingent to trial value. Although the reward-driven enhancement of movement execution has been proposed to occur through enhanced feedback control, an untested possibility is that it is also driven by increased arm stiffness, an energy-consuming process that enhances limb stability. Computational analysis revealed that reward led to both an increase in feedback correction in the middle of the movement and a reduction in motor noise near the target. In line with our hypothesis, we provide novel evidence that this noise reduction is driven by a reward-dependent increase in arm stiffness. Therefore, reward drives multiple error-reduction mechanisms which enable individuals to invigorate motor performance without compromising accuracy.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformancePunishmentReaction TimeYoung Adultaction execution.action selectionfeedback controlreachingreinforcementstiffness

Identifiers

PMID32234779
PMCPMC7189755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.