ArticleRespiratory care2020
Participant Retention in Follow-Up Studies of Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.
Article in Respiratory care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multi-Modal Mobile Phone-Based Communication Strategy to Maximize Retention in a Post-Intensive Care Follow-up Study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.Research square · 2026Article
- Building resilience when disaster strikes: adapting clinical trials in critical illness recovery.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- Oxygenation Severity Categories and Long-Term Quality of Life among Children who Survive Septic Shock.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2024Article
- Participant retention in follow-up studies of intensive care unit survivors - A scoping review.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2024Article
- Fibrotic-Like Pulmonary Radiographic Patterns Are Not Associated With Adverse Outcomes in COVID-19 Chronic Critical Illness.Critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Effects of Stress Psychological Intervention on the Cardiopulmonary Function, Negative Emotion, Self-Efficacy, and Quality of Life in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith an increasing number of follow-up studies of acute respiratory failure survivors, there is need for a better understanding of participant retention and its reporting in this field of research. Hence, our objective was to synthesize participant retention data and associated reporting for this field.
methodsTwo screeners independently searched for acute respiratory failure survivorship studies within a published scoping review to evaluate subject outcomes after hospital discharge in critical illness survivors.
resultsThere were 21 acute respiratory failure studies (
conclusionsParticipant retention was generally high but varied greatly across individual studies and time points, with 24% of studies reporting inadequate data to calculate retention rate. High participant retention is possible, but resources for optimizing retention may help studies retain participants. Improved reporting guidelines with greater adherence would be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.