Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32234745›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

'You have got a foreign body in there': renal transplantation, unexpected mild-to-moderate distress and patients' support needs: a qualitative study.

Janet Jones, Sarah Damery, Kerry Allen, Johann Nicholas, Jyoti Baharani, Gill Combes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Long-term physical and psychological consequences of chronic kidney disease].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet JonesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK j.e.jones@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9057-6956
Sarah DameryInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kerry AllenHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Johann NicholasRenal Unit, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK.
Jyoti BaharaniRenal Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Gill CombesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore why transplant patients experience unexpected mild-to-moderate distress and what support they may need.

designQualitative study using individual in-depth interviews.

settingFour National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in the Midlands, UK.

participantsFifteen renal transplant patients meeting the criteria for mild-to-moderate distress from their responses to emotion thermometers.

main outcome measuresIdentification of the reasons for distress and support options acceptable to renal transplant patients.

resultsThree themes were interpreted from the data: 'I am living with a "foreign body" inside me', 'why am I distressed?' and 'different patients want different support'. Following their transplant, participants felt that they should be happy and content, but this was often not the case. They described a range of feelings about their transplant, such as uncertainty about the lifespan of their new kidney, fear of transplant failure or fear of the donor having health conditions that may transfer to them. A few experienced survivors' guilt when others they had met at the dialysis unit had not received a transplant or because someone had died to enable them to receive the transplant. No longer having regular contact with the renal unit made participants feel isolated. Some participants did not initially attribute the source of their distress to their transplant. Participants' preferred support for their distress and their preferences about who should deliver it varied from peer support to seeing a psychologist.

conclusionsRaising the issue of post-transplant mild-to-moderate distress with patients and encouraging them to think about and plan coping strategies pretransplant may prove beneficial for the patient and healthcare provider. Patients should be able to choose from a variety of support options.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedFearFemaleForeign BodiesHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchanxiety disordersqualitative researchrenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID32234745
PMCPMC7170619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.