Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32234744›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Assessing the feasibility of a rapid, high-volume cervical cancer screening programme using HPV self-sampling and digital colposcopy in rural regions of Yunnan, China.

Andrew Goldstein, Lena Sophia Goldstein, Roberta Lipson, Sarah Bedell, Jue Wang, Sarah A Stamper, Gal Brenner, Gail R Goldstein, Karen Davis O'Keefe, S Casey O'Keefe and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Future of Cervical Cancer Screening.International journal of women's health · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew GoldsteinObstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA obstetrics@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-2402
Lena Sophia GoldsteinYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Roberta LipsonBeijing United Family Hospitals and Clinics, Beijing, China.
Sarah BedellThe Center for Vulvovaginal Disorders, Washington, DC, USA.
Jue WangBeijing United Family Hospitals and Clinics, Beijing, China.
Sarah A StamperDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gal BrennerMobileODT, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gail R GoldsteinAnnapolis Dermatology Center, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.
Karen Davis O'KeefeBellingham Bay Family Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
S Casey O'KeefePacific Northwest Urology Specialists, Washington, DC, USA.
McKenna O'KeefeEngineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Tierney O'KeefeBellingham Bay Family Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Amelia R GoldsteinDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anna ZhaoBeijing United Family Hospitals and Clinics, Beijing, China.
Duke University · USBeijing United Family Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImplementation of a novel, rapid, high-volume, see-and-treat cervical cancer screening programme using self-swab human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and digital colposcopy in underserved regions of Yunnan China.

design480-980 women per day self-swabbed for high-risk HPV (hrHPV+). Four careHPV machines (Qiagen) were run simultaneously to test the specimens. All hrHPV+ patients were contacted the same day and digital colposcopy was performed with the enhanced visual assessment system (MobileODT). Digital images were obtained, and all suspected lesions were biopsied and then treated.

settingRural and underserved areas of the Yunnan province, Kunming municipality.

participants3600 women, mean age 50.2 years, who had never been screened for cervical cancer. The women were of the Yi, Hui, Dai and Han ethnicities.

interventionsCryotherapy was performed on all lesions suspicious for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and loop electrosurgical excision procedure was performed on all lesions suspicious for ≥CIN2. Endocervical curettage was performed if the transformation zone was not fully visualised.

results216 women (6%) were hrHPV+. 168 underwent same-day colposcopy (23 CIN1, 17≥CIN2). Digital colposcopy was able to identify 15 of 16 (93.8%)≥CIN2 lesions.

conclusionsThis study illustrates a high-volume, rapid and practical strategy that can be used to screen and treat an ethnically diverse group of Chinese women. First, HPV self-sampling allows large numbers of women to be screened rapidly and relatively inexpensively. Only hrHPV+ women will then require further evaluation. Digital colposcopy is then performed on hrHPV+ women with a portable digital colposcope. The high-resolution images obtained can facilitate appropriate same-day treatment as they are able to accurately distinguish between CIN1 and ≥CIN2 lesions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChinaColposcopyCryotherapyEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRural PopulationSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasmscolposcopygynaecological oncologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID32234744
PMCPMC7170644
OpenAlexW3013630883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.