ArticleESMO open2020
Feasibility of next-generation sequencing in clinical practice: results of a pilot study in the Department of Precision Medicine at the University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'.
Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives From an Expert-Guided Discussion on Maximizing the Research Potential of Small Biopsy Tissue.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive molecular alterations of prostate cancer brain metastases based on a companion diagnostic assay.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Off-label drug use in oncology: integrating molecular and genetic analysis in an academic center's real-world approach.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Genomically matched therapy in refractory colorectal cancer according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets: experience of a comprehensive cancer centre network.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Feasibility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in Real-Life Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical management of molecular alterations identified by high throughput sequencing in patients with advanced solid tumors in treatment failure: Real-world data from a French hospital.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Comprehensive genome profiling by next generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in solid tumors: a single academic institution experience.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Master Protocols for Precision Medicine in Oncology: Overcoming Methodology of Randomized Clinical Trials.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Implications of the germline variants of DNA damage response genes detected by cancer precision medicine for radiological risk communication and cancer therapy decisions.Journal of radiation research · 2021Review
- Clinical Application of the FoundationOne CDx Assay to Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2020
Authors and funding
25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe emerging role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted panels is revolutionising our approach to cancer patients, providing information on gene alterations helpful for diagnosis and clinical decision, in a short time and with acceptable costs. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this work, we evaluated the clinical application of FoundationOne CDx test, a hybrid capture-based NGS. This test identifies alterations in 324 genes, tumour mutational burden and genomic signatures as microsatellite instability. The decision to obtain the NGS assay for a particular patient was done according to investigator's choice.
resultsOverall, 122 tumour specimens were analysed, of which 84 (68.85%) succeeded. The success rate was influenced by type of specimen formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE block vs FFPE slides), by origin of the sample (surgery vs biopsy) and by time of fixation (<5 years vs ≥5 years). The most frequent subgroups of effective reports derived from colorectal cancer (25 samples), non-small-cell lung cancer (16 samples), ovarian cancer (10 samples), biliary tract cancer (9 samples), breast cancer (7 samples), gastric cancer (7 samples). The most frequent alterations found in whole population referred to
conclusionsOn our opinion, CGP could be proposed in clinical practice in order to select patients that could most benefit from the analysis proposed, like patients with good performance status without any available treatments or with unexpected resistance to a therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.