Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32234707›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Clinical Applications of Mobile Health Wearable-Based Sleep Monitoring: Systematic Review.

Elise Guillodo, Christophe Lemey, Mathieu Simonnet, Michel Walter, Enrique Baca-García, Vincent Masetti, Sorin Moga, Mark Larsen, HUGOPSY Network, Juliette Ropars and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A deep learning-enabled smart garment for accurate and versatile monitoring of sleep conditions in daily life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Observational

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Elise GuillodoUrci Mental Health Department, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-2627
Christophe LemeyIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, F-29238 Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-7958
Mathieu SimonnetIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, F-29238 Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-8961
Michel WalterEA 7479 SPURRBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3071-7673
Enrique Baca-GarcíaFundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-6555
Vincent MasettiClinea Psychiatry France, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8830-5153
Sorin MogaIMT Atlantique, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0968-785X
Mark LarsenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-2053
HUGOPSY Network *Please see Acknowledgements for list of collaborators, .
Juliette RoparsLaboratoire de Traitement de l'Information Médicale, INSERM, UMR 1101, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-759X
Sofian BerrouiguetIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, F-29238 Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-6218
Université de Bretagne Occidentale · FRInserm · FRBlack Dog Institute · AUCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESIMT Atlantique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep disorders are a major public health issue. Nearly 1 in 2 people experience sleep disturbances during their lifetime, with a potential harmful impact on well-being and physical and mental health.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to better understand the clinical applications of wearable-based sleep monitoring; therefore, we conducted a review of the literature, including feasibility studies and clinical trials on this topic.

methodsWe searched PubMed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science through June 2019. We created the list of keywords based on 2 domains: wearables and sleep. The primary selection criterion was the reporting of clinical trials using wearable devices for sleep recording in adults.

resultsThe initial search identified 645 articles; 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. In all, 4 categories of the selected articles appeared. Of the 19 studies in this review, 58 % (11/19) were comparison studies with the gold standard, 21% (4/19) were feasibility studies, 15% (3/19) were population comparison studies, and 5% (1/19) assessed the impact of sleep disorders in the clinic. The samples were heterogeneous in size, ranging from 1 to 15,839 patients. Our review shows that mobile-health (mHealth) wearable-based sleep monitoring is feasible. However, we identified some major limitations to the reliability of wearable-based monitoring methods compared with polysomnography.

conclusionsThis review showed that wearables provide acceptable sleep monitoring but with poor reliability. However, wearable mHealth devices appear to be promising tools for ecological monitoring.

Indexed as

PolysomnographySleepTelemedicineWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultHumansReproducibility of ResultseHealthmedicinereviewsleeptelemedicinewearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID32234707
PMCPMC7160700
OpenAlexW2981705411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.