Predicting Speech Perception in Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Automatic Speech Recognition.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Automating Speech Audiometry in Quiet and in Noise Using a Deep Neural Network.Biology · 2025
   Article
2. OPRA-RS: A Hearing-Aid Fitting Method Based on Automatic Speech Recognition and Random Search.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
   Article
3. Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Optimize Hearing-Aid Time Constants.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
   Article
4. Microscopic and Blind Prediction of Speech Intelligibility: Theory and Practice.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as