ArticlePalliative medicine2020
Managing uncertainty and references to time in prognostic conversations with family members at the end of life: A conversation analytic study.
Article in Palliative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving communication of prognostic uncertainty in advanced illness: a realist review.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Dying as a 'normal', 'ordinary' or 'natural' process in palliative care: a systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- "Triggering the palliative intent"?: A qualitative implementation evaluation of a prognostication model for advanced dementia (PRO-MADE) in a geriatric tertiary care setting for the integration of early palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Clinician use of 'worry' statements during surrogate decision making in the hospital.Patient education and counseling · 2025Article
- Communicating prognostic uncertainties in advanced multimorbidity: a multimethod qualitative study to co-design practice recommendations.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Improving specialist palliative care discharges from hospitals and hospices to community settings: a qualitative interview study of the communication experiences of patients, carers, and primary care professionals.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Prognostic beliefs in patients with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Initiating Prognostic Talk During Hospice Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- Determining timeframes to death for imminently dying patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Time estimates in prognostic discussions: A conversation analytic study of hospice multidisciplinary team meetings.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- 'How long do you think?' Unresponsive dying patients in a specialist palliative care service: A consecutive cohort study.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study: Eliciting ICU Experiences and Measuring Outcomes of Family Caregivers of Patients Who Have Undergone Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of family nursing · 2023Article
- A narrative study of unforgettable dying stories of Chinese patients in the intensive care unit: an eight-year experience.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Organizational readiness to implement the Serious Illness Care Program in hospital settings in Sweden.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Communicating with patients and families about illness progression and end of life: a review of studies using direct observation of clinical practice.BMC palliative care · 2021Review
- Prognostic Uncertainty in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Qualitative Study.Neurocritical care · 2021Article
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Prognostication in Oncology, Dementia, Frailty, and Pulmonary Diseases.Journal of palliative medicine · 2021Article
- Structure and process of palliative care provision: a nationwide study of public hospitals in Thailand.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- The impact of uncertainty on bereaved family's experiences of care at the end of life: a thematic analysis of free text survey data.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen patients are likely to die in the coming hours or days, families often want prognostic information. Prognostic uncertainty and a lack of end-of-life communication training make these conversations challenging.
aimThe objective of this study is to understand how clinicians and the relatives/friends of patients at the very end of life manage uncertainty and reference time in prognostic conversations.
designConversation analysis of audio-recorded conversations between clinicians and the relatives/friends of hospice inpatients. SETTING/
participantsExperienced palliative care clinicians and relatives/friends of imminently dying hospice inpatients. Twenty-three recorded conversations involved prognostic talk and were included in the analysis.
resultsRequests for prognostic information were initiated by families in the majority of conversations. Clinicians responded using categorical time references such as 'days', allowing the provision of prognostic estimates without giving a precise time. Explicit terms such as 'dying' were rare during prognostic discussions. Instead, references to time were understood as relating to prognosis. Relatives displayed their awareness of prognostic uncertainty when requesting prognostic information, providing clinicians with 'permission' to be uncertain. In response, clinicians often stated their uncertainty explicitly, but presented evidence for their prognostic estimates, based on changes to the patient's function previously discussed with the family.
conclusionPrognostic uncertainty was managed collaboratively by clinicians and families. Clinicians were able to provide prognostic estimates while being honest about the related uncertainty, in part because relatives displayed their awareness of uncertainty within their requests. The conversation analytic method identified contributions of both clinicians and families, and identified strategies based on real interactions, which could inform communication training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.